We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 238

Court of Appeal raises issues of construction and medical treatment that should be considered by a higher court in future cases
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 18 2015

Both Bayer and Cobalt appealed from the Court’s judgment. Both appeals were addressed by the Court of Appeal in this decision. The Court of Appeal


Compliance with Order in the absence of stay renders appeal of Order moot
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 18 2015

The Prothonotary ordered the production of certain documents, and the Court dismissed the appeal of this Order as moot. This is a further appeal. The


Ontario Court of Appeal conclusively dismisses generic’s unjust enrichment arguments in section 8 case
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 18 2015

Apotex has brought a case against Lilly pursuant to s. 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (the NOC Regulations). As part


Motion for reply evidence granted in part
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 1 2015

This is an appeal from the decision of a Prothonotary, denying leave to file reply evidence in a proceeding pursuant to the Patented Medicines


Ramipril section 8 appeal dismissed from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2015

On Monday, April 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada heard the appeal of 2014 FCA 68, relating to the issue of damages under section 8 of the


Formulation patent found not to be infringed as a redacted excipient was not a “pentahydric or hexahydric alcohol”
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2015

Apotex has successfully alleged that Teva’s patent to “Stable Compositions Containing Rasagiline” will not be infringed by Apotex’s use of a


Patent claiming one medicinal ingredient not found to have sufficient product specificity to be listed against a drug containing two medicinal ingredients
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 29 2015

The Court of Appeal has dismissed Viiv Healthcare’s appeal of a Prothonotary’s decision (2014 FC 328; upheld by the Federal Court: 2014 FC 893


Prohibition order upheld on appeal allegation as to inutility not justified
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 23 2012

The Court of Appeal (FCA) upheld the Prohibition Order granted by the Federal Court


Motion for default judgment denied without affidavit evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • October 28 2013

The Plaintiffs brought a motion for default judgment after no Statement of Defence was filed and no response to the Request to Admit was provided. The


Application to amend inventorship allowed
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 6 2013

By this application, Sega sought an Order amending the named inventors of a patent. The application was uncontested by the respondent who did not file