We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 372

Court dismisses motion for Confidentiality Order
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 18 2017

The Court dismissed Teva's motion for a confidentiality order. The underlying proceeding is an action by Teva to recover from Janssen and others


Federal Court Holds That a Request to Find a Dead Patent Application in Good Standing Must Fail
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 10 2017

The Federal Court has refused to declare that an application is in good standing after the applicants or their agents failed to reply to a requisition


Findings Made in Section 8 Case to Allow Determination of Quantum of Damages
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 10 2017

In this case, Teva is seeking compensation pursuant to s. 8 of the NOC Regulations for having been prevented from coming to market with its generic


Motion for default judgment denied without affidavit evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • October 28 2013

The Plaintiffs brought a motion for default judgment after no Statement of Defence was filed and no response to the Request to Admit was provided. The


Formulation patent found not to be infringed as a redacted excipient was not a “pentahydric or hexahydric alcohol”
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2015

Apotex has successfully alleged that Teva’s patent to “Stable Compositions Containing Rasagiline” will not be infringed by Apotex’s use of a


Court Refuses Motion to Amend Brought After the Commencement of the Quantification Trial
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 10 2017

This decision concerned the quantification phase following the liability determination, which found AstraZeneca's patent valid and infringed. Apotex


Patent held to not be infringed based on the construction of the claims
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 14 2016

Apotex sent a NOA to Shire alleging its patent was invalid and will not be infringed by Apotex. The issues were narrowed for the hearing, where


Patent is not found to be a selection patent, and thus was anticipated and obvious
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2015

The Federal Court has dismissed an application for prohibition to prevent the Minister of Health from issuing an NOC to Mylan for cinacalcet


Expert "Blinding" is a Question of Relevance, Reliability and Weight, but not Admissibility
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • October 12 2016

On August 23, 2016, the Federal Court released its public judgment granting the Order of prohibition for Gilead's ‘619 Patent. The ‘619 Patent


Court grants motion to reopen trial and admit new evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 27 2011

The Federal Court granted leave to reopen the trial and admit new evidence in a matter under reserve, in which no reasons or judgement have issued