We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 250

Canadian Patent Appeal Board Upholds Claims to Non-exemplified Humanized Antibodies
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 9 2016

In a rare and long-awaited piece of good news for antibody patent applications in Canada, the Patent Appeal Board ("the Board") recently allowed


Bifurcation of Infringement and Validity Issues in Section 8 Action
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 10 2016

This is a motion for bifurcation in an action brought pursuant to section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations


Court grants motion to reopen trial and admit new evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 27 2011

The Federal Court granted leave to reopen the trial and admit new evidence in a matter under reserve, in which no reasons or judgement have issued


Pleadings for disgorgement of profits and for an accounting of profits in s.8 damages not struck in Ontario court
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 1 2012

In this case, Apotex has claimed damages in Ontario Court pursuant to, inter alia, section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Lilly brought a motion to strike out parts of Apotex’ statement of claim


Good news for antibody patent applications in Canada
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 27 2014

Patentees in the antibody arts in Canada have long been dogged by policy-based objections to claims that seek protection that is broader than the


Reply affidavits allowed when new documents introduced in responding evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 9 2014

In this case, there is a partial reversal of evidence. Apotex brought a motion for leave to file reply evidence. Allergan did not oppose parts of the


A finding of a settlement agreement is overturned because counsel did not have the authority to bind his client
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 25 2016

The Federal Court of Appeal has overturned the earlier finding that Allergan and Apotex had settled their patent infringement litigation (2015 FC


Supreme Court Upcoming Leave to Appeal Decisions
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 9 2016

The Supreme Court will announce the result of a leave application which asks the correct applicable standard for patent utility in Canada and whether


Import Ban Quashed, and Health Canada Ordered to Retract Its Statements re Same
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 13 2016

Apotex et al brought a judicial review of the Minister of Health's (the Minister) decision to impose an import ban on products from two of Apotex'


Astrazeneca Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2015 FC 671
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 7 2015

The parties moved under Rule 397 to modify the terms of the judgment in the proceeding, previously reported as 2015 FC 322 and summarized in our