We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 232

Reply affidavits allowed when new documents introduced in responding evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 9 2014

In this case, there is a partial reversal of evidence. Apotex brought a motion for leave to file reply evidence. Allergan did not oppose parts of the


Motion for Interim Injunction Dismissed for Failing to Establish Irreparable Harm
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 14 2016

TearLab brought a motion for an interim injunction, with the hearing for an interlocutory injunction being scheduled in late April or May. TearLab is


Compound patent held to be not soundly predicted for the level of promised utility found by the Court
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 24 2016

The Federal Court has dismissed an application for prohibition concerning the drug ALIMTA. Although the parties joined issue on a significant number


Patent held to not be infringed based on the construction of the claims
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 14 2016

Apotex sent a NOA to Shire alleging its patent was invalid and will not be infringed by Apotex. The issues were narrowed for the hearing, where


Formulation patent found not to be infringed as a redacted excipient was not a “pentahydric or hexahydric alcohol”
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2015

Apotex has successfully alleged that Teva’s patent to “Stable Compositions Containing Rasagiline” will not be infringed by Apotex’s use of a


Witness' Evidence Given Less Weight because not Blinded to Patent or Issues; NOC Proceeding Dismissed
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 14 2016

Apotex sent a NOA in respect of a single patent, alleging obviousness and lack of utility. The Court held that allegation was justified. In


Supreme Court Upcoming Leave to Appeal Decisions
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 9 2016

The Supreme Court will announce the result of a leave application which asks the correct applicable standard for patent utility in Canada and whether


Patent is not found to be a selection patent, and thus was anticipated and obvious
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2015

The Federal Court has dismissed an application for prohibition to prevent the Minister of Health from issuing an NOC to Mylan for cinacalcet


Pleadings for disgorgement of profits and for an accounting of profits in s.8 damages not struck in Ontario court
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 1 2012

In this case, Apotex has claimed damages in Ontario Court pursuant to, inter alia, section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Lilly brought a motion to strike out parts of Apotex’ statement of claim


Motion for particulars in action under section 8 denied as not necessary
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 1 2015

Pfizer brought a motion in an action brought pursuant to section 8 of the Patented Medicines(Notice of Compliance) Regulations seeking to strike