We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 227

Leave to appeal dismissed where, inter alia, "conflicting" decisions regarding the issues in play were not from Ontario
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2016

The Ontario Court dismissed Pfizer's motion for leave to appeal from the decision dismissing its motion to strike out various claims, made by Apotex


Motion for reply evidence granted in part
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 1 2015

This is an appeal from the decision of a Prothonotary, denying leave to file reply evidence in a proceeding pursuant to the Patented Medicines


Formulation patent allegations of non-infringement, obviousness and lack of utility justified
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 2 2015

Servier sought a prohibition order against Apotex in relation to its DIAMICRON MR gliclazide product. The application was dismissed. The patent at


FCA reinstates PMPRB jurisdiction over generic companies with permission from patentee to sell medicine as they enjoyed a benefit from the patent
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • November 9 2015

In these cases, the government appealed Federal Court decisions that allowed judicial reviews of multiple PMPRB decisions. The issue on appeal was


Decision to dismiss motion to strike portions of statement of defence and counterclaim upheld on appeal
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • December 17 2015

A Prothonotary dismissed a motion by Teva Canada Limited (Teva) to strike certain paragraphs in the statement of defence and counterclaim by the


Motion to Dismiss NOC Proceeding Granted Non-Infringement as an Abuse of Process
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • December 14 2016

Apotex's motion to dismiss Valeant's NOC Proceeding pursuant to s. 6(5)(b) of the NOC Regulations was granted with costs. Apotex's NOA alleged


Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2015 FC 770
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 7 2015

Novartis has obtained an order prohibiting the Minister from providing an NOC to Teva for EXJADE. At the hearing, the issues were narrowed by Teva


Supreme Court dismisses leave application relating to utility and sound prediction
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 29 2015

The Supreme Court has dismissed Apotex’s leave to appeal a PM(NOC) decision (2014 FCA 250) that related to utility and sound prediction. The Supreme


Struck paragraphs claiming section 8 losses relating to overall market share are allowed back into the pleadings
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • October 21 2015

The Federal Court has allowed an appeal of a Prothonotary's decision that struck out certain paragraphs of an Amended Statement of Claim without


Compound patent held to be not soundly predicted for the level of promised utility found by the Court
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 24 2016

The Federal Court has dismissed an application for prohibition concerning the drug ALIMTA. Although the parties joined issue on a significant number