We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 62

Biosimilar Approvals in the US and Canada - Sidestepping the 'Patent Dance'
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • January 12 2016

A passing moment of social awkwardness between a couple on a dance floor is nothing compared to the situation when the sidestepping is between two


Biosimilar Approvals in the US and Canada - the ‘Patent Dance’
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • December 30 2015

The US and Canada each provide an abbreviated pathway (or shortcut) for a biosimilar manufacturer to get a product approved. The shortcut allows for a


Canadian Appeal Court itching to consider patented medical treatments
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • May 25 2015

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal has recently indicated its interest in revisiting patentability of methods of medical treatment in future in a


Proactive pharma patent enforcement on Canadian drug combos
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • May 14 2015

The Canadian Patented Medicine (Notice of Compliance) Regulations ("NOC Regulations") allow a patent owner to apply to Federal Court to keep a


Supreme Court dismisses appeal from the bench in Sanofi-Aventis v. Apotex, Inc.
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • May 8 2015

On April 21st, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed from the bench an appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal decision inApotex Inc. v


The Supreme Court refuses to grant leave to hear “promise of the patent” appeals
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • April 27 2015

On April 23, 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to hear an appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Apotex Inc v Pfizer Canada


CIPO updates guidance on medical use claims
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • March 23 2015

On March 18, 2015 the Canadian Intellectual Property Office issued a practice notice containing revised examination practice guidelines pertaining to


Expert opinion as to what “one would expect” is speculation, not evidence
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • March 4 2015

In the latest of a trilogy of cases under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relating to the drug tadalafil (CIALIS), Justice


What to expect when you are expecting to launch a drug in Canada regulatory overview
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • March 2 2015

This article provides a brief overview of key regulatory issues to be aware of when marketing a drug in Canada. Price Regulation and Reimbursement


Federal court overturns Commissioner of Patents: claims with fixed dosages and dosing schedules held not to be methods of medical treatment
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • January 16 2015

In AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd v Canada (Attorney General) "AbbVie" the Federal Court allowed AbbVie's appeal of a decision by the Commissioner of