We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 238

Allegations of Invalidity Found Justified on the Basis of Obviousness
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 15 2017

In this case, the Federal Court dismissed an application for an order of prohibition. The patent at issue claimed pharmaceutical formulations of


Application for Prohibition Granted for Generic Version of Concerta
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 18 2017

The Court granted Janssen's application prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing an NOC to Actavis for its generic version of Concerta. The


Court grants motion to reopen trial and admit new evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 27 2011

The Federal Court granted leave to reopen the trial and admit new evidence in a matter under reserve, in which no reasons or judgement have issued


Patent is not found to be a selection patent, and thus was anticipated and obvious
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2015

The Federal Court has dismissed an application for prohibition to prevent the Minister of Health from issuing an NOC to Mylan for cinacalcet


Claims under Section 8 of the NOC Regulations and under Ashby v. White struck in Ontario Court
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 24 2016

In the Ontario Court, Apotex claimed damages pursuant to, inter alia , section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Pfizer brought a motion to strike out parts


Appeal from motion to compel answers arising from discovery dismissed
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • December 17 2015

The appellants (Hospira) brought a motion to compel answers to 354 questions refused or taken under advisement at the discovery of the Respondents


Leave to appeal dismissed where, inter alia, "conflicting" decisions regarding the issues in play were not from Ontario
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2016

The Ontario Court dismissed Pfizer's motion for leave to appeal from the decision dismissing its motion to strike out various claims, made by Apotex


Supreme Court Updates - Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts - Week of January 16, 2017
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 18 2017

The Supreme Court of Canada announced that judgment in this application for leave to appeal will be delivered on Thursday, January 19, 2017. The


Formulation patent allegations of non-infringement, obviousness and lack of utility justified
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 2 2015

Servier sought a prohibition order against Apotex in relation to its DIAMICRON MR gliclazide product. The application was dismissed. The patent at


Court Dismisses Alexion's Appeals from Three Separate Orders
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 1 2017

The Court dismissed Alexion's appeals concerning three separate Orders. The first appeal concerned Prothonotary Aalto's Order allowing the