We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 217

Supreme Court Leaves to Intervene Granted
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 31 2016

The Supreme Court has granted leave to intervene to the following: Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada (jointly); the Centre for Intellectual


Court declares Minister's decision restricting importation of drugs from two of Apotex's drug manufacturing facilities in India unlawful
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 24 2016

Apotex et al. Brought a judicial review (JR) of the Minister of Health's August 2015 decision that varied the terms and conditions of Apotex's Drug


Standard of Review of Palpable and Overriding Error Not Applied in Appeal from Rule 51 Appeal
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • January 27 2016

This is an appeal from the Federal Court's (FC) decision (2015 FC 797), which upheld the Prothonotary's decision allowing the generic Respondent's


Formulation patent found not to be infringed as a redacted excipient was not a “pentahydric or hexahydric alcohol”
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • April 22 2015

Apotex has successfully alleged that Teva’s patent to “Stable Compositions Containing Rasagiline” will not be infringed by Apotex’s use of a


Patent claim resulted from “skilled work”, not “creative work”, and is found to be obvious
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • December 3 2015

The Federal Court has dismissed an application for prohibition for obviousness. The invention was described as “to take the ‘naturally occurring'


Novopharm v. Pfizer
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • October 27 2010

Novopharm brought a motion before the Federal Court seeking confidentiality for its Notice of Allegation (NOA) in the proceeding


A finding of a settlement agreement is overturned because counsel did not have the authority to bind his client
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 25 2016

The Federal Court of Appeal has overturned the earlier finding that Allergan and Apotex had settled their patent infringement litigation (2015 FC


Claims under Section 8 of the NOC Regulations and under Ashby v. White struck in Ontario Court
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 24 2016

In the Ontario Court, Apotex claimed damages pursuant to, inter alia , section 8 of the NOC Regulations. Pfizer brought a motion to strike out parts


Application for an order of prohibition dismissed for formulation patent
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • March 18 2015

The Court found that Mylan’s allegations of non-infringement and obviousness were justified. As a result, the application for prohibition was


Appeal in NOC Proceeding dismissed as moot
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 9 2015

The Court of Appeal granted Teva’s motion to have an appeal from a NOC Proceeding dismissed as moot. The Respondent’s request for an oral hearing of