We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,996

Patent Disputes over Wearables May Herald Broader Patent Litigation Regarding the Internet of Things
  • Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2016

The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to a network of physical objects containing sensors or actuators along with electronics for network connections

Gene sequencing: the new battleground
  • EverEdgeIP
  • USA
  • March 9 2016

"We are currently, and expect to be in the future, party to patent lawsuits and other intellectual property rights claims that are expensive and time

Standard-Essential Patents and Pooling - March 2016 - April 2016 Developments
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Canada, European Union, India, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 29 2016

April 13, 2016: Microsoft alleged unlawful monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act in relation to InterDigital's licensing of patents

The Hololens from Microsoft help can be right underover your nose
  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • USA
  • July 28 2015

The saying - never let them see you sweat - soon may be more difficult to accomplish with Microsoft's Hololens. Like Google Glass, the Hololens is

WiFi "sniffing" ruled not a violation of the Wiretap Act where patent holder sought to collect information that was available over public WiFi networks
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 7 2012

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC ("Innovatio") filed patent infringement actions against various hotels, coffee shops, restaurants and supermarkets for the use of wireless Internet technology located throughout the United States

Leveling the playing field: Amazon.com, Facebook, Microsoft, and others back Netflix, Inc.’s bid for consideration of "exceptional" Patent Case Standard Under 35 U.S.C. 285
  • Williams Mullen
  • USA
  • September 28 2010

A number of retailers and technology giants including Amazon.com, Facebook, and Microsoft have filed amicus briefs with the Federal Circuit in support of Netflix, Inc.’s petition for rehearing en banc in Media Queue, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et al. Netflix successfully parried Media Queue’s patent infringement charges in California district court, but was denied attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. 256, because the court concluded that the case failed to qualify as "exceptional" under the statute

  • Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd
  • China
  • August 30 2016


Design Patents - Could a “Real” Design Solve a “Virtual” Problem? Protecting Innovative Design Against Physical or Online Infringing Products
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2016

Want to buy a Porsche 911 for only $159? Well, now you can. Or at least you can buy the virtual 3-D model of a Porsche 911 to 3-D print or to use in

Apple v. Samsung Electronics: the perils of email auto deletion
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2012

Apple recently received an e-discovery victory in their global patent battle with Samsung Electronics

CAFC rules on patent exhaustion
  • Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

The patents-in-suit are directed to sending text messages with a link to a website, and a user can click on the link to retrieve content from the