We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 2,088

On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related


비자명성(Non-Obviousness)에 의한 거절이유가 2 부족할 때
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • South Korea, USA
  • October 4 2016

미국 특허법에서 35 U.S.C. 103은 특허를 받는 기술이 종래의 기술에 비추어 보았을 때 해당 분야의 통상의 기술을 가진 자에게 자명(obvious)하지 않을 것을 요구합니다. 이것은 세상에 이미 알려진 바와 비교했을 때 너무 “뻔한” 기술한테는 특허라는


Federal Circuit Construes Claim Term in a Manner that Rendered Claim Language Superfluous
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2016

In SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile Commc'ns AB, Appeal No. 2015-1251, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's judgment of


Amazon Defeats Appistry’s Distributed Computing Patents With Finding Of Patent Ineligibility
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2016

On July 19, 2016, the District Court for the Western District of Washington (“Court”) dismissed a patent suit because the asserted patents (U.S


Software and Business Method Inventions After Alice
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • September 23 2016

Patent attorneys are often asked the question: “Is my idea patentable?” Often the idea is related to software or business methods. Well-known business


Amazon Not Liable for Patent Infringement When Other Companies Sell Infringing Products on Amazon's Website
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2015

A Washington court recently held that Amazon was not liable for patent infringement when other companies sold infringing goods on Amazon's website


New patent infringement decision could pose problems for e-commerce business
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2015

In August, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the federal appellate court with national jurisdiction over patent lawsuits


Changes to competition law exemptions for technology agreements
  • McCann FitzGerald
  • European Union, Ireland
  • July 25 2014

Agreements that have as their object or effect the restriction of competition are generally prohibited under EU competition law, subject to certain


Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Apple-Samsung Patent Case
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • October 14 2016

During oral arguments on Tuesday, justices of the U.S. Supreme Court grappled with the appropriate standard by which to assess damages for


A few competition law thoughts on the Internet of Things
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • European Union
  • March 31 2016

These days, there’s so much technology inside household device that some of them, like smart fridges, can communicate with other devices and even take