We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,717

Automotive technology - a new battleground for patent wars?
  • Dehns
  • United Kingdom
  • February 28 2014

Perhaps appropriately, the car industry stands at a crossroads. Some fifteen years after the Toyota Prius showed that mass market hybrids were

Judge sanctions Samsung for “auto-delete” of relevant emails when litigation was “reasonably foreseeable”
  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • USA
  • September 25 2012

In one of the rulings from the recent patent mega-trial between tech giants Apple and Samsung regarding smartphones and tablet computers, the Court (Judge Grewal) granted a request from Apple for an adverse inference instruction that Samsung had “failed to preserve evidence” and that the evidence destroyed could be presumed to be favorable to Apple

Federal Circuit affirms jury verdict of invalidity based on on-sale bar and public use
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 28 2012

Affirming the district court’s judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cleared Facebook of allegations of patent infringement, finding that that the patent in suit was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) because the patentee’s product which embodied the patented subject matter was on sale and in public use more than one year before the filing of the patent

Surfing the Internet - don’t let leaked information wipe out your patents
  • D Young & Co
  • European Union
  • December 3 2013

Before the advent of the Internet, publication of information to a global audience used to require significant planning and financing.This meant

WiFi "sniffing" ruled not a violation of the Wiretap Act where patent holder sought to collect information that was available over public WiFi networks
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 7 2012

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC ("Innovatio") filed patent infringement actions against various hotels, coffee shops, restaurants and supermarkets for the use of wireless Internet technology located throughout the United States

“Upselling” patent case against Amazon dismissed
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On March 25, 2015, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a patent infringement case against Amazon.com Inc., saying that the patent at issue covered

News and cases from China: August - September 2015
  • Rouse
  • China
  • October 29 2015

Recently, the National Copyright Administration issued Implementing Measures for the Copyright Administrative Penalties (Revision Draft for Comment

Alice one year later litigation trends in districts courts and the PTAB
  • Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • USA
  • June 10 2015

Almost one year ago, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. CLS Bank, a decision that fundamentally changed the way software claims are

Covered business method patent held invalid under 35 USC 101 and Alice
  • Briggs and Morgan
  • USA
  • May 22 2015

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has issued a Final Written Decision of the invalidity of an Internet-related patent under the subject matter

Avoiding PTAB sanctions just play by the rules
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 30 2014

Despite having the authority to sanction parties for misconduct (see 37 C.F.R. 42.12), until the Board’s decision in SAP America et al. V. Lakshmi