We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 38,654

For National Security, Trump Administration Initiates Rarely Used Section 232 Statute to Probe Into Steel Imports
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • May 28 2017

On April 19, 2017, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross launched a Section 232 investigation on all steel imports from anywhere in the world. On April


Threats Muddy Waters: unjustified threats of infringement in the Full Federal Court of Australia
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • May 26 2017

A decision in March of the Full Federal Court in Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd 2017 FCAFC 44 concerning unjustified threats of


Court May Consider Both Sides’ Conduct in Exceptional Case Analysis
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2017

Judge Shah denied defendants’ (collectively “Bosch”) 35 USC 285 motion for attorney’s fees in this patent dispute involving tool patents


Key Takeaways: Software Patent Prosecution Requires Data-Based Strategies Due to Patent Office Inconsistencies
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2017

Kilpatrick Townsend attorneys Kate Gaudry, Ph.D. and Thomas D. Franklin recently presented at the Practising Law Institute’s 11th Annual Patent Law


JUDGMENT: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co v UCB Pharma SA
  • 20 Essex Street
  • United Kingdom
  • May 26 2017

Justiciability and Act of State Revisited In its interesting judgment in Chugai v UCB, the Patents Court has resolved a number of questions relating



Supreme Court Restricts Where Plaintiffs Can Sue for Patent Infringement
  • K&L Gates
  • USA
  • May 25 2017

For almost thirty years, patent owners sued corporate defendants for patent infringement in any federal judicial district in which that corporation


The Last “Cabilly” Challenge Quietly Settles
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • May 25 2017

U.S. Pat. No. 6,331,415, commonly referred to as “Cabilly II,” has been called one of the most-litigated patents of all time, having been challenged


Due Diligence: Calculating the Regulatory Review Period for Patent Term Extension
  • Pepper Hamilton LLP
  • USA
  • May 25 2017

When applying for a patent term extension (PTE), due diligence matters. If an applicant did not act with due diligence during the testing phase or


Kite与Sloan Kettering癌症研究所的双方复审程序案例
  • Dilworth IP
  • USA
  • May 25 2017

2016年12月美国专利局的专利审判和上诉委员会PTAB发布了有关Kite与Sloan Kettering专利的双方复审程序Inter Partes ReviewIPR