We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 31,194

Productivity Commission recommends extensive changes to Australian IP - including fair use, circumventing geoblocks, abolishing business method and software patents and more!
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • April 29 2016

Today, the Productivity Commission has released its draft report into Australia's intellectual property arrangements. IP Whiteboard readers may


Productivity Commission recommends extensive changes to Australia’s intellectual property laws
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • April 29 2016

On 29 April 2016, the Productivity Commission released its draft report on its inquiry into Australia's intellectual property arrangements. The


Don’t Bury Your Head in the Sand! - Effective Intellectual Property Due Diligence
  • Watermark Patent & Trade Marks Attorneys
  • USA
  • April 29 2016

Intellectual Property (IP) due diligence can represent a critical part in an overall due diligence process in connection with a number of business


Case of First Impression: Federal Circuit Endorses Patent-Agent Privilege
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

In a case of first impression regarding whether communications between a non-lawyer patent agent and a client are legally privileged, a split panel


Factual Assertions Cannot Be Made for the First Time at Oral Argument
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

Addressing the procedural aspects of making factual assertions during an inter partes review (IPR), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit


Federal Circuit Rejects ITC’s Authority over Intangible Articles
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a request for rehearing en banc in ClearCorrect Operating v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, (IP Update


PTAB Redundancy Doctrine Is Legal but Unhelpful
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

Addressing the Patent Trial and Appeals Board's (PTAB's or Board's) reliance on the so-called redundancy doctrine in connection with instituting


Denying Institution on “Redundant” Grounds Is Proper
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

Addressing the authority of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) to determine the specific grounds for institution, the US Court of


Advertisement and Subsidy Program Qualifies as Financial Product or Service Under Broad CBM Definition
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the broad applicability of the financial prong of the eligibility test for covered business


PTAB Flushes Assignor Estoppel as Defense in IPR Proceeding
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

In two separate decisions involving the same parties, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or