We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,501

Rules of the (International) Road, Brexit, PPP as a New Tool for Argentina, and Keeping Non-U.S. Companies Safe from Suit (Expect Focus International - August 2016)
  • Carlton Fields
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • August 31 2016

For decades, U.S. courts have been preferred venues for plaintiffs’ lawyers seeking to sue non-U.S. companies. This is due to the perception that

The Brexit and Patent Law: What You Need to Know
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • August 23 2016

Now that some time has passed since the Brexit vote, some of the ways in which the vote is likely to impact British patent law are becoming clearer

Brexit: what now for the Unified Patent Court?
  • Marks & Clerk
  • European Union, Germany, United Kingdom
  • August 17 2016

European Union countries have spent over forty years attempting to establish, in one form or another, a unitary patent that would take effect across

Streamlining oppositions procedures at the EPO
  • Marks & Clerk
  • European Union
  • August 16 2016

The European Patent Office (EPO) opposition procedure allows any person to challenge the validity of a European patent within nine months of its

Court rules that proteins produced through different methods are same product under SPC regulation
  • Hogan Lovells
  • European Union, France
  • August 15 2016

On January 18 2007 the US government filed supplementary protection certificate (SPC) application 08C0003 in regard to a European patent for

Impact of Brexit on US IP owners
  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • August 10 2016

The outcome of the Brexit referendum has caused substantial uncertainty among US businesses and IP owners. While the short-term issues should be

Claimed ranges and patent infringement under the doctrine of equivalents
  • Jacobacci & Partners
  • European Union, Italy
  • August 10 2016

In the recently published decision of Geratherm Medical AG v Gima SPA (Decision 126572015) the Court of Milan ruled that patent protection for a

MoFo IP newsletter - August 2016
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • August 10 2016

On June 13, 2016, in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., 579 U.S. (2016), the Supreme Court unanimously abrogated the Federal

La obligación contractual de pagar un canon por la utilización de una tecnología después de haber sido declarada nula la patente que la protegía no es una práctica colusoria
  • Gómez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados
  • European Union
  • August 5 2016

Uno de los problemas recurrentes en los contratos de licencia de patente (y deotros derechos de propiedad industrial) es el de determinar qué sucede

Brussels GA&P (July 2016)
  • Gómez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados
  • European Union, Spain
  • August 5 2016

Up to March 2015 ATM owners and banks issuing credit cards (issuing banks) had an agreement where they approved the right to use each others ATMs at a