We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 711

Arkema France wins the first instance of the patent invalidation administrative case
  • Liu, Shen & Associates
  • China
  • November 17 2014

On May 19, 2014, Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court entered a judgment to uphold the No. 19514 Decision on Invalidation (hereafter referred to


SPC invites public comments on draft amendments to judicial interpretation on application of law in trial of patent dispute cases
  • China Patent Agent (HK) Ltd
  • China
  • July 18 2014

The Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) published on 16 July 2014 the Decision on Amendments to Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court of


Key points of the recent amendment to legal interpretations related to trail of patent infringement
  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • China
  • October 23 2014

On July 31st, the Supreme People's Court (SPC) of China published a draft of the Interpretations of the SPC on Certain Issues Concerning the


Interpreting claims in multiple ways Jiaxing MELLKIT Kitchen Technology Co., Ltd.et.al. V. Zhejiang Youpon Integrated Ceiling Corp(Article No. 3 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)
  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • China
  • October 29 2014

Claim interpretation is the key to determine the scope of protection of claims. The meaning of the claims can be determined based on internal and


楼氏电子与歌尔声学专利侵权诉讼评析
  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • China
  • October 31 2014

2014 年 4 月潍坊市中级人民法院针对歌尔声学股份有限公司以下简称“歌尔声学”诉楼氏电子苏州有限公司以下简称“楼氏电子苏州”专利 侵权系列案做出了部分判决


Recent proposed amendments to China’s Patent Law: will it help to improve the enforceability of patents in China?
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • China
  • October 29 2014

By 2015, the Chinese government plans to double the number of patent applications filed with the State Intellectual Property Office (“SIPO”), such


Two cases represented by CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office included in the “10 innovative cases concerning IPR protection in 2014” by the Beijing Higher People's Court
  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • China
  • April 27 2015

The Beijing Higher People's Court issued the "10 typical cases and 10 innovative cases concerning IPR protection in 2014" tried by Beijing courts on


The determination of obvious mistakes in patent application Liang HONG v. Patent Reexamination Boardent Reexamination Board (Article No. 2 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)
  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • China
  • October 24 2014

In patent invalidation procedure, if the technical solution defined by a claim fails to be clearly described in the detailed description, the claim


The story of battling giants: comments on Goertek Acoustics v. Knowles Electronics
  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • China
  • October 31 2014

In April 2014, the Weifang City Intermediate People's Court made decisions in two of five patent infringement lawsuits between GoerTek Acoustics and


Shimano Inc. v. Patent Reexamination Board, return of the new matter issue to its regular understanding?
  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • China
  • January 19 2015

On December 27, 2013, the Supreme People’s Court of China made its Judgment on Shimano Inc. v. Patent Reexamination Board (i.e. PRB). Supreme