We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 410

Court May Consider Both Sides’ Conduct in Exceptional Case Analysis
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2017

Judge Shah denied defendants’ (collectively “Bosch”) 35 USC 285 motion for attorney’s fees in this patent dispute involving tool patents


Filing Patents Does Not Create Jurisdiction Outside of the E.D. Virginia
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 24 2017

Judge Pallmeyer granted declaratory judgment defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in this ANDA


Website Information Can be Reliable Evidence for Prior Patent Use
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

Judge Lefkow granted in part plaintiff Peerless’ renewed Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) motion for judgment as a matter of law as to invalidity and, in the


Supreme Court Ruling Affects Patent Venue
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2017

The patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) (the statute) states that "any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial


February 2017 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2017

February filings were slow, even compared to the two prior slow months. Frequent filers included Blackbird Technologies, Freenys, Guyzar, Hawk


January 2017 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 2 2017

January filings continued to be pleasantly slow. Frequent filers included Anuwave, Freenys, Guyzar, Hawk Technology Systems, LGRT Pro, Reflection


Claim Language Disavowal Must be Clear & Definitive
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2017

Judge Kennelly construed the disputed terms of plaintiff Green Pet Shop’s patents to a pressure-activated cooling pad for pets. Of particular note


Counsel’s Unresponsiveness Warrants Dismissal
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 28 2017

Judge Coleman denied plaintiff Marshall Feature Recognition’s (“MFR”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) & 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order


Expert Claim Constructions of Unconstrued Claims Excluded
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 26 2017

Judge Pallmeyer granted in part plaintiff NDY’s FRE 702 motion to exclude certain portions of defendants’ noninfringement expert report in this


December 2016 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2017

December filings continued to be happily slow. Frequent filers included e.Digital, Hawk Technology, Internet Medial Interactive, Phoenix Licensing