We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 402

In re: Magnum Oil Tools International
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The Federal Circuit reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) finding of obviousness duringinter partes review (IPR) of a patent related


Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The plaintiff, The Medicines Company (MedCo), sued in the District of Delaware alleging that the Defendant’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA


Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

Amgen Inc. brought an action against Apotex Inc. under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) alleging that Apotex’s marketing of


Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The patentee appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment of non-infringementincluding for indirect infringement of method claims


Rapid Litigation Management v. Cellzdirect, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The patentee asserted its patent for a process of preserving hepatocytes. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant, finding that


Polar Electro Oy v. Suunto Oy
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The patentee appealed the district court’s decision granting the alleged infringer’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The alleged


In Re: Aqua Products, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

Aqua Products, Inc. (patent owner) appealed from a written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in an inter partes review (IPR) of a


Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

The patentee appealed the district court’s grant of the accused infringer’s motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), finding that the claims


SAS Institute, Inc. v. ComplementSoft, LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

On SAS’s petition for inter partes review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted a review on some but not all of the challenged


Intendis GMBH, et al. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2016

In a Hatch-Waxman case, the district court held that the alleged infringer’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) product, a topical gel for the