We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 384

In re: Man Machine Interface Tech LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

A third party sought ex parte reexamination of a patent relating to a remote control device. The examiner rejected some of the claims as being


Rembrandt Vision Techs, L.P. v. Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

The patent owner appealed the district court’s denial of a Rule 60(b)(3) motion for a new trial following a jury’s verdict that the plaintiff had


Genetic Technologies Limited v. Merial LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

The patentee sued for infringement of a patent related to methods of analyzing sequences of DNA within an individual’s genome. Specifically, the


Merck & Cie v. Gnosis S.P.A. and South Alabama Medical Science v. Gnosis S.P.A
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

In Merck & Cie v. Gnosis S.P.A. (Gnosis I), the petitioner filed a petition for rehearing en banc of a panel decision affirming the result in an


Sport Dimension, Inc., v. The Coleman Company, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

The patentee claimed infringement of its design patent for a personal flotation device. The parties stipulated to a judgment based on the court’s


HP Inc. v. MPHJ Technology Investments
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

The petitioner filed for inter partes review (IPR) of certain claims of the patent-in-suit, asserting that the contested claims were invalid as


In re: TC Heartland LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 12 2016

Congress’ 2011 amendments to 28 U.S.C. 1391 did not overrule Federal Circuit precedent holding that the definition of corporate residence in the


In re: Smith
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2016

The applicant appealed a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) affirming the rejection of claims directed to a variation of Blackjack


Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2016

The plaintiff, a Hong Kong corporation, sued the defendant, a Canadian corporation, in the Northern District of Illinois for infringement of


In re: Cree, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2016

The Federal Circuit upheld a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) determination that a patent on a method of creating LED white light was invalid as