We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 408

Veritas Technologies LLC v. Veeam Software Corporation, No. 2015-1894 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

PTAB may not summarily dismiss patent owner’s motions to further amend combination claims


In re: CSB-System International, Inc., No. 2015-1832 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

Once a patent expires, the USPTO must construe claims pursuant to Phillips rather than utilizing broadest reasonable interpretation


Murata Machinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuka Co., Ltd., No. 2015-2094 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

District courts have broad discretion to grant a stay of proceedings, but denial of a preliminary injunction motion must be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law


Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., No. 2015-2073 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

“Common sense” may provide a missing limitation in an obviousness analysis only when supported by evidence and a reasoned explanation


Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., No. 2013-1472 and 2013-1656 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

Decisions regarding enhanced damages applying the old Seagate standard require remand in light of the Supreme Court’s Halo decision


Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 2015-1256 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

A district court may consider claim construction arguments raised for the first time on a motion to reconsider


Polar Electro Oy v. Suunto Oy
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The patentee appealed the district court’s decision granting the alleged infringer’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The alleged


In re: Magnum Oil Tools International
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The Federal Circuit reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) finding of obviousness duringinter partes review (IPR) of a patent related


Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The patentee appealed a district court decision granting summary judgment of non-infringementincluding for indirect infringement of method claims


Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2016

The plaintiff, The Medicines Company (MedCo), sued in the District of Delaware alleging that the Defendant’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA