We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 440

D’Agostino v. Mastercard International, Nos. 2016-1592 and 2016-1593 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 22, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

PTAB must reasonably construe claim terms in an IPR


Cumberland Pharmaceuticals v. Mylan Institutional LLC, Nos. 2016-1155 and 2016-1259 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 26, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

FDA request for study does not amount to derivation where study request did not clearly encompass all elements of the later issued claims


Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, No. 2015-2067 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Specificity of packaging and instructions leads to finding of induced infringement under Akamai V standard


Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc., No. 2016-1544 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Federal Circuit denies appeal of PTAB ruling for failure to prove injury in fact


In re: Van Os, No. 2015-1975 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Obviousness finding based on motivation to combine on “common sense” grounds under KSR must provide explicit and clear reasoning


Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Intl., Nos. 2015-1329 and 2015-1388 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Induced infringement requires “actual infringement,” and findings of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents may give rise to improper “claim


In re: Ethicon, Inc., No. 2015-1696 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Reference teaching alternative embodiment is acceptable prior art; age of reference immaterial


Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications International, No. 2016-1449 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 5, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

A term of degree is not indefinite as “purely subjective” if the intrinsic evidence makes a POSITA reasonably certain of the scope of the invention


In re: Nuvasive, Inc., Nos. 2015-1672 and 2015-1673 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 14 2016

PTAB’s refusal to give patentee opportunity to address key portion of prior art reference violates APA


Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation, No. 2015-1599 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 14 2016

Claims directed to mental processes are patent-ineligible abstract ideas under 101