We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 447

Laches Cannot Bar Damages for Patent Infringement Within the Six Year Statute of Limitations
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2017

Building on its 2014 copyright decision in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled 7-1 yesterday that the equitable defense of


Personal WebTechnologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2016-1174 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2017

PTAB’s obviousness determination for challenged patent vacated for lack of sufficient support


Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, No. 2015-1919 (Feb. 15, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2017

While sending letters into a forum is not enough for personal jurisdiction to be "fair and reasonable," if a party "does more," then jurisdiction may


Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. The Toro Company, Nos. 2016-2433 and 2016-2514 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2017

An absent claim limitation and an unsupported motivation to combine are not sufficient to raise a substantial question as to a patentee’s likelihood


Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Strava, Inc., No. 2016-1475 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2017

USPTO examiner and the PTAB can rely on expert declarations in reexamination as long as declaration relates to factual findings


“Substantial portion of the components” for infringement under Section 271(f)(1) requires more than a single component
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2017

The Supreme Court recently issued important guidance on the meaning of Section 271(f)(1) of the Patent Act, which makes it an act of infringement to


D’Agostino v. Mastercard International, Nos. 2016-1592 and 2016-1593 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 22, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

PTAB must reasonably construe claim terms in an IPR


Cumberland Pharmaceuticals v. Mylan Institutional LLC, Nos. 2016-1155 and 2016-1259 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 26, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

FDA request for study does not amount to derivation where study request did not clearly encompass all elements of the later issued claims


Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc., No. 2016-1544 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Federal Circuit denies appeal of PTAB ruling for failure to prove injury in fact


In re: Van Os, No. 2015-1975 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

Obviousness finding based on motivation to combine on “common sense” grounds under KSR must provide explicit and clear reasoning