We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 419

ClassCo, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., No. 2015-1853 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 22, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Obviousness combinations require “flexible approach” and consideration of evidence of nonobviousness


McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America, No. 2015-1080 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 13, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Method claims reciting specific means or improvements to the art are patentable, while method claims directed to abstract results or effects using


Drone Technologies, Inc. v. Parrot S.A., Nos. 2015-1892 and 2015-1955 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 29, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Proportionality requirements of FRCP 26(b)(2)(C) apply at initial disclosures stage under local Patent Rules


Husky Injection Molding Systems v. Athena Automation Ltd., Nos. 2015-1726 and 2015-1727 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 23, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Federal Circuit lacks jurisdiction to review PTAB determinations on whether assignor estoppel precludes institution of IPR; incorporation by reference


Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. DIRECTV, LLC, 2015-1845 (Fed. Cir., Sept. 23, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Conventional business practices implemented by a generic computer are patent-ineligible under 101


Stryker Corporation v. Zimmer, Inc., No. 2013-1668 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Willfulness finding under subjective prong of old Seagate standard sufficient under the Halo standard, and even with a willfulness finding, decision


LifeNet Health v. LifeCell Corporation, No. 2015-1549 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Negative functional limitations can recite structural elements and be directly infringed by product sales


Asia Vital Components Co. v. Asetek Danmark AS, No. 2015-1597 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 8, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Conduct that can be reasonably inferred as demonstrating intent to enforce a patent is required to establish declaratory judgment jurisdiction Asia


Lyda v. CBS Corporation, No. 2015-1923 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 30, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2016

Under the TwomblyIqbal pleading standard, infringement allegations must provide for a reasonable inference that each claim step was performed by or


Veritas Technologies LLC v. Veeam Software Corporation, No. 2015-1894 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 30, 2016)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

PTAB may not summarily dismiss patent owner’s motions to further amend combination claims