We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 541

Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin Week of July 17, 2017
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 19 2017

In this case, AbbVie brought an application against Samsung pursuant to the NOC Regulations. The parties agreed that a protective order was needed


Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts Bulletin Week of July 10, 2017
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 12 2017

Motion on additional read-ins allowed in part; hearsay excluded Excalibre Oil Tools Ltd. v. Advantage Products Inc., 2016 FC 1130 In this patent


Motion for bifurcation of liability issues, as well as counterclaim for section 8 damages, dismissed
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 3 2017

The Court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ motion for a bifurcation order requesting that liability issues in this infringement action be tried separately


Supreme Court of Canada invalidates the promise doctrine
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • July 3 2017

In this decision, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) overturned the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA), and held the patent to be valid and


Re-examination process stayed pending resolution of patent infringement action
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 28 2017

In this motion, Camso requested a stay of a request made by a law firm, Brouillette Partners, to the Commissioner of Patents to re-examine one of


Motion to Amend Dismissed in Respect of the Contested Amendments
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 7 2017

The Court dismissed the Plaintiffs by Counterclaim's motion to amend their statement of defence and counterclaim in respect of the contested


Federal Court Reissues its Original Decision to Award Section 8 Damages After the Federal Court of Appeal Held the Original Decision Relied on Inadmissible Hearsay Evidence
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • June 7 2017

The Federal Court has reaffirmed and reissued its original decision awarding section 8 damages to Teva following a redetermination that was ordered by


Appeal of a finding of non-infringement of a U.S. Patent dismissed
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 31 2017

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal of the Trial Judge's decision finding that the Respondent had not infringed the Appellant's patent in


Apotex's claims against current and former Ministers and civil servants working at the Ministry of Health is not struck for a lack of jurisdiction
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 31 2017

The Federal Court has refused to strike a claim brought by Apotex against current and former ministers and civil servants working at the Ministry of


Defendant satisfied the two threshold factors for the right to examine the assignors
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 31 2017

The Court dismissed an application to strike three appointments to examine for discovery. The underlying action concerns a claim for negligence