We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 192

No Approval for Generic Product for Treatment of Rosacea
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 28 2016

Addressing infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and obviousness issues, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the


Federal Circuit ruling clears way for approval of generic version of Fentora
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 29 2013

Addressing allegations of patent infringement by a generic version of Fentora, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed in


MIPO files unilateral motion to terminate investigation based on consent order
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 21 2010

MIPO Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and MIPO Technology Limited (collectively "MIPO") filed a unilateral motion to terminate the investigation based on a consent order in Inv. No. 337-TA-723, Certain Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof


Commission modifies-in-part ALJ's finding but not ultimate outcome in no. 337-TA-720
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 14 2011

On November 10, the Commission issued the public version of an opinion modifying in part former Chief ALJ Luckern’s ID in Inv. No. 337-TA-720, Certain Biometric Scanning Devices, Components Thereof Associated Software and Products Containing the Same


Violation of ITC Consent Order Can Be Based on “Infringement” of Invalid Claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 23 2015

Reviewing the International Trade Commission’s (ITC or Commission) finding of a violation of a consent order, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of


Federal Circuit upholds ITC interpretation of 337 to cover induced infringement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 17 2015

Suprema, IncBy way of background, appellee Suprema manufactures hardware for scanning fingerprints. The scanners must be connected to a computer


Use of “antithesis” of claim element does not bar application of doctrine of equivalents
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

In a Hatch-Waxman case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the use of a claimed step, characterized as the “antithesis” of


Federal Circuit panel rejects ITC assertion of authority over intangible articles
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 30 2015

Reviewing an interpretation by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC or Commission) of its enabling statute ( 337 of the Tariff Act) for the


On remand, panel affirms ITC finding of Section 337 violation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 30 2015

In a non-precedential remand decision, the original panel in the case of Suprema v. International Trade Commission affirmed the International Trade


Federal Circuit upholds ITC interpretation of 337 to cover induced infringement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In a 6-4 ruling, a sharply divided en banc Federal Circuit overturned the original panel decision and deferred to the International Trade