We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 192

No Approval for Generic Product for Treatment of Rosacea
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 28 2016

Addressing infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and obviousness issues, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the


ALJ Essex orders respondents to respond to discovery requests in 337-TA-804
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March 9, 2012, ALJ Essex granted complainants Litepanels, Inc.’s and Litepanels, Ltd.’s (“Litepanels”) motion to compel discovery and ordered respondents Fuzhou F&V Photographic Equipment Co., Ltd (“F&V”) and Shantou Nanguang Photographic Co. Ltd. (“Nanguang “) to provide full and complete responses various interrogatories and requests for production


On remand, panel affirms ITC finding of Section 337 violation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 30 2015

In a non-precedential remand decision, the original panel in the case of Suprema v. International Trade Commission affirmed the International Trade


ID on infringement and public interest in remand of interdigital investigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In a long-running investigation brought by InterDigital concerning Nokia mobile phones, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) on the remand hearing from


Commission declines to review determination granting microsoft's motion on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 7 2012

On March 7, 2012, the Commission issued a notice of its decision not to review the ALJ Essex’s initial determination granting complaint Microsoft Corporation’s motion for summary determination on the economic prong of the domestic injury requirement in Inv


MIPO files unilateral motion to terminate investigation based on consent order
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 21 2010

MIPO Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and MIPO Technology Limited (collectively "MIPO") filed a unilateral motion to terminate the investigation based on a consent order in Inv. No. 337-TA-723, Certain Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof


Commission modifies-in-part ALJ's finding but not ultimate outcome in no. 337-TA-720
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 14 2011

On November 10, the Commission issued the public version of an opinion modifying in part former Chief ALJ Luckern’s ID in Inv. No. 337-TA-720, Certain Biometric Scanning Devices, Components Thereof Associated Software and Products Containing the Same


New complaint filed by Rovi Corporation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 28 2011

Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., United Video Properties, Inc., and Gemstar Development Corporation filed a letter on July 26, 2011, requesting that the International Trade Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 covering Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology


Quantify versus quality determines domestic industry
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a finding by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of a violation of 337


U.S.-centered negotiations for product made and sold outside United States do not constitute sale or offer for sale in United States
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 26 2014

In a case exploring the limits of what constitutes a sale or offer for sale “within the United States” under 35 U.S.C. 271(a), the U.S. Court of