We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 139

New request for investigation filed against Apple, Inc.
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 27 2011

On September 22, VIA Technologies Inc., IP-First LLC, and Centaur Technology Inc. filed a letter with Secretary Holbein requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 regarding Certain Computing Devices with Associated Instruction Sets and Software


S3 Graphics Co. Ltd and S3 Graphics Inc. file request for investigation against Apple, Inc.
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 26 2011

On September 22, S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. and S3 Graphics Inc. filed a letter with Secretary Holbein requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 regarding Certain Electronic Devices with Graphics Data Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software


Federal Circuit clarifies entire market value rule, hypothetical negotiation date and use of settlement agreements
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 6 2012

In LaserDynamics v. Quanta Computer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned an $8.5 million lump sum jury award and remanded the case for a new trial on damages


ALJ Bullock issues initial determination allowing termination of Arco from inv. 337-TA-799
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 6 2012

ALJ Bullock issued an initial determination granting Complainant MyKey Technology Inc.’s motion to terminate the investigation and stay all proceedings as to respondent Data Protection Solutions by Arco


LG files response to amended complaint in Inv. no. 337-TA-805
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 8 2012

On March 8, 2012, LG Display Co., Ltd. filed a Response and Affirmative Defenses to the Amended Complaint of Industrial Technology Research Institute and ITRI International and Notice of Investigation in Inv. No. 337-TA-805, Certain Devices for Improving Uniformity Used in a Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same


Commission declines to review determination granting microsoft's motion on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 7 2012

On March 7, 2012, the Commission issued a notice of its decision not to review the ALJ Essex’s initial determination granting complaint Microsoft Corporation’s motion for summary determination on the economic prong of the domestic injury requirement in Inv


Claim construction order issues in Inv. 337-TA-796
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 6 2012

On March 6, 2012, ALJ Pender issued an order construing terms of asserted patents in Inv. 337-TA-796, Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof


ALJ Bullock issues initial determination terminating the investigation as to drugstore.com
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March, 9, 2012, Chief ALJ Bullock issued an initial determination granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent drugstore.com based on a consent order stipulation in Inv. No. 337-823, Certain Kinesiotherapy Devices and Components Thereof


ALJ Essex orders respondents to respond to discovery requests in 337-TA-804
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March 9, 2012, ALJ Essex granted complainants Litepanels, Inc.’s and Litepanels, Ltd.’s (“Litepanels”) motion to compel discovery and ordered respondents Fuzhou F&V Photographic Equipment Co., Ltd (“F&V”) and Shantou Nanguang Photographic Co. Ltd. (“Nanguang “) to provide full and complete responses various interrogatories and requests for production


ALJ Pender denies a non-party motion to quash but grants motion to limit subpoenas issued in 337-TA-808
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March 9, 2012, ALJ Pender issued an order denying non-party Openwave System Inc.’s (“Openwave”) motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum and subpoena ad testificandum served by Respondent Apple, Inc. (“Apple”