We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 139

Commission clarifies domestic industry requirement based on licensing, terminates Inv. No. 337-TA-694
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 25 2011

On July 22, the full Commission reversed ALJ Charneski's finding that the Complainant’s portfolio licensing program satisfied the domestic industry requirement, and offered new guidance on the proof necessary to satisfying the requirement based on licensing, in Inv. No. 337-TA-694, Certain Multimedia Display and Navigation Devices and System Components Thereof and Products Containing Same


New complaint filed by Furuno names Honeywell and Skyforce as proposed respondents
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 4 2011

The ITC received a new complaint on September 30, 2011 filed on behalf of Furuno Electric Co. Ltd. and Furuno USA Inc


Federal Circuit issues opinion in General Protecht Corp v. ITC
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 30 2010

On August 27, 2010, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion on the appeal from Inv. No. 337-TA-615, General Protecht Corp. v. ITC


ALJ Rogers denies motion to quash a subpoena issued to non-party dupont and permits complainant to present live testimony of DuPont witness
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 5 2012

On March 5, 2012, ALJ Rogers issued an order denying complainant Kaneka Corporation’s motion to quash the subpoena ad testificandum issued to E.I


No permanent injunction if plaintiff and defendant did not directly compete; ongoing royalty to be applied instead
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2012

Addressing a lower court’s decision to impose a permanent injunction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the lower court, finding that an ongoing royalty for future infringement was the appropriate remedy


Fabri-Kal corporation files complaint at ITC
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 5 2012

On March 5, 2012, Fabri-Kal Corporation filed a complaint at the U.S. International Trade Commission entitled Certain Food Containers, Cups, Plates, Cutlery, and Related Items, and Packaging Thereof


ALJ Essex issues ID granting motion for entry of default in Inv. 337-TA-804
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 5 2012

ALJ Essex issued an initial determination granting Complainant Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.’s motion for entry of default against respondents Zhejiang Lux Electric Co. Ltd., Zhejiang Yuelong Mechanical and Electrical Co. Ltd., Wenzhou Huir Electric Science & Technology Co. Ltd., American Top Electric Corp., and Big Deal Electric Corp


RIM, HTC, LG, Apple, Samsung, and Sony named in complaint filed by Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 5 2012

On March 5, 2012, Graphics Properties, Holdings, Inc. filed a complaint at the U.S. International Trade Commission entitled Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices and Products Containing Same naming the following proposed respondents


Federal Circuit clarifies entire market value rule, hypothetical negotiation date and use of settlement agreements
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 6 2012

In LaserDynamics v. Quanta Computer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned an $8.5 million lump sum jury award and remanded the case for a new trial on damages


Entire market value ruleR.I.P.?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2012

In an opinion that addresses the proper framework for evaluating reasonable royalty damages in the patent infringement context, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a jury award of an $8.5 million lump sum and remanded the case for a new trial on damages