We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 139

No permanent injunction if plaintiff and defendant did not directly compete; ongoing royalty to be applied instead
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2012

Addressing a lower court’s decision to impose a permanent injunction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the lower court, finding that an ongoing royalty for future infringement was the appropriate remedy


Entire market value ruleR.I.P.?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2012

In an opinion that addresses the proper framework for evaluating reasonable royalty damages in the patent infringement context, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a jury award of an $8.5 million lump sum and remanded the case for a new trial on damages


Commission determines not to review ALJ's finding of no violation in 337-TA-717
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 20 2011

On July 18, 2011, the Commission determined not to review ALJ Robert K


LG files response to amended complaint in Inv. no. 337-TA-805
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 8 2012

On March 8, 2012, LG Display Co., Ltd. filed a Response and Affirmative Defenses to the Amended Complaint of Industrial Technology Research Institute and ITRI International and Notice of Investigation in Inv. No. 337-TA-805, Certain Devices for Improving Uniformity Used in a Backlight Module and Components Thereof and Products Containing the Same


Commission declines to review determination granting microsoft's motion on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 7 2012

On March 7, 2012, the Commission issued a notice of its decision not to review the ALJ Essex’s initial determination granting complaint Microsoft Corporation’s motion for summary determination on the economic prong of the domestic injury requirement in Inv


Claim construction order issues in Inv. 337-TA-796
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 6 2012

On March 6, 2012, ALJ Pender issued an order construing terms of asserted patents in Inv. 337-TA-796, Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof


ALJ Pender denies a non-party motion to quash but grants motion to limit subpoenas issued in 337-TA-808
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March 9, 2012, ALJ Pender issued an order denying non-party Openwave System Inc.’s (“Openwave”) motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum and subpoena ad testificandum served by Respondent Apple, Inc. (“Apple”


ALJ Essex denies motion to supplement expert report
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 6 2012

On March 6, 2012, ALJ Essex denied the Trek Complainants’ motion for leave to supplement their opening infringement expert report


Federal Circuit clarifies entire market value rule, hypothetical negotiation date and use of settlement agreements
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 6 2012

In LaserDynamics v. Quanta Computer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned an $8.5 million lump sum jury award and remanded the case for a new trial on damages


ALJ Bullock issues initial determination terminating the investigation as to drugstore.com
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 9 2012

On March, 9, 2012, Chief ALJ Bullock issued an initial determination granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent drugstore.com based on a consent order stipulation in Inv. No. 337-823, Certain Kinesiotherapy Devices and Components Thereof