We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 26,379

2015 first-half invention patent applications in China up 20
  • China Patent Agent (HK) Ltd
  • China
  • July 29 2015

According to the statistics released recently by the State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO), a total of 1,124,000 patent applications for


Patent marking requirements in ASEAN
  • Mirandah Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • July 29 2015

Patent marking involves marking a Patented product with its patent number. This serves to inform the general public of the existence of a patent


Patent Trial and Appeal Board claim construction cannot be unreasonable
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or


Covered business patents jurisdiction continues to develop
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In three parallel decisions, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that patents directed to validating payment and then


Empowering customers to sell an exonerated accused product
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In a decision that expands a customer’s right to defend itself under the Kessler doctrine, the Federal Circuit clarified that a customer is not


In seeking patent review, timing matters
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Clarifying the “final written decision” rule in Covered Business Method (CBM) reviews, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained


A kinder, gentler PTAB allows claim amendments
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In a final written decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) agreed with the petitioner that the original challenged claims were


Price optimization in e-commerce not patent eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice addressing patent-eligible subject matter (IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 7), the U.S. Court of Appeals


No deference by the Federal Circuit to lower courts’ claim construction findings
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing issues of claim construction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed the decisions of two district courts


Keep the petitions concise
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing the issues of voluminous petitions and obviousness, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or