We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 33,416

Rules of the (International) Road, Brexit, PPP as a New Tool for Argentina, and Keeping Non-U.S. Companies Safe from Suit (Expect Focus International - August 2016)
  • Carlton Fields
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • August 31 2016

For decades, U.S. courts have been preferred venues for plaintiffs’ lawyers seeking to sue non-U.S. companies. This is due to the perception that


Experimental evidence in patent cases: Discovery not available for experiments on matters no longer in issue
  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • Australia
  • August 26 2016

In patent cases, it is not uncommon to conduct preliminary experiments on a confidential and privileged basis prior to deciding whether or not to


Full Court warns against dangerous affliction of parameteritis (and confirms invalidity of aripiprazole patent)
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • August 26 2016

On Wednesday the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia handed down a decision in which it upheld Justice Yates' findings that Otsuka's patent


Zero Sum Game? Australian Patent Office Fee Changes
  • Shelston IP Pty Ltd
  • Australia
  • August 26 2016

From 10 October 2016, some official fees reduced or eliminated while other fees have been increased for all Australian patents and patent


AUNZ Update: Opposing a patent application via third party observations
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • August 26 2016

If you've identified a patent application in Australia or New Zealand that you wish to oppose, there are a number of options to consider. Maybe you


May 2016 Retail Patent Litigation Report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2016

May was quiet except for a handful of frequent NPE filers, including BSG Tech, Hawk Technology, T-Rex Properties and Uniloc. As usual, I prepared the


Claim Amendment Déjà Vu All Over Again?
  • Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC
  • USA
  • August 25 2016

The Federal Circuit seemingly had put to rest the question of whether, in making an amendment in an IPR, the petitioner bears the burden of proving


“Consisting of:” Not as Narrow as You Think
  • Carter DeLuca Farrell & Schmidt LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2016

The transitional phrases “comprising” and “consisting of” are well defined terms of art in Patent Law; the former being inclusive and the latter


The Evolving Standard for Pleading Direct Patent Infringement
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2016

It has been a little more than half a year since the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abrogated Rule 84 and put an end to the Form


Indonesia Update: Amendments to Indonesian Patent Law
  • Spruson & Ferguson
  • Indonesia
  • August 25 2016

Amendments to the Indonesian Patent Law, which were passed by the Indonesian Parliament on 28 July 2016, are expected to come into effect on 28 August