We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 29,486

Asset Transferee Cannot Appeal Reexamination
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal in Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Technologies Corp., because the appellant was not a “third-party


TIPO Stipulates "Guidelines for Electronic Priority Document Exchange (PDX) Between Taiwan and South Korea"
  • Tsai Lee & Chen Patent Attorneys & Attorneys at Law
  • Taiwan
  • February 4 2016

A full text of the Guidelines containing 7 items in the Order Eco-Auth-Intel No. 10420031151 was stipulated and promulgated by the Ministry of


CAFC Again Emphasizes Patentee Burden for PTAB Amendment
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

In Prolitec, Inc., v. Scentair Technologies, Inc. the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) confirmed that patentees bear the burden of


Asset Transferee Cannot Appeal Reexamination
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

The Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal in Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Technologies Corp., because the appellant was not a "third-party


SIPO proposes to amend the patent law
  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • China
  • February 4 2016

Almost four months after the submission of the draft Patent Law Amendment Bill of China proposed by SIPO, which passed through the Bureau Affairs


Defendants' Motion Seeking to Depose Opposing Counsel Denied Where Defendants Could Not Show That Information Was Unavailable from Another Source
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

After the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants for patent infringement, the defendants contended that they uncovered during discovery a series


Application to vary the ownership of patent granted where assignor inadvertently assigned rights to Gray Automotive Products, Inc., as opposed to Gray Automotive Products Co.
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • February 4 2016

The Federal Court granted an application under section 52 of the Patent Act to vary all entries of the Patent Office relating to the ownership of


Review Instituted and Joinder Granted IPR2015-01871
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

In its Decision, the Board granted inter partes review of challenged claims 1-22 of the ’431 Patent and granted joinder with IPR2015-00903


Practical Post-Grant Tip: Waiver of Service
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

When considering an inter partes review in conjunction with a pending patent infringement suit, defendants must time the filing of their petition to


GFIT, LLC v. FLA Orthopedics, Inc. et al
  • Dickinson Wright PLLC
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

GFIT, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against FLA Orthopedics, Inc. and BSN Medical, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) for patent infringement of U.S