We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 33,993

Legal Opinion on the UK’s participation in the UPC after Brexit
  • Marks & Clerk
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 30 2016

The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) and some other parties have requested an Opinion from Legal Counsel on questions relating to the


Forum Selection & PTAB Estoppel Burden
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

As most are aware, completed AIA trial proceedings have estoppel consequences for failed petitioners. For example, an unsuccessful Inter Partes Review


Prosecution Pointer
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

Patent assignment information is publicly available for patent application publications pursuant to 37 CFR 1.12(a)(1) from the Patent Assignment


Federal Circuit Finds Software Patent Claims Eligible Under Step One of the Alice Framework
  • Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

On September 13, 2016, the Federal Circuit held that McRO’s patent claims are subject matter eligible for protection under 35 U.S.C. 101. Notably


District Court Holds that Document Retention and Destruction Policies Are Privileged under Court's Default Discovery Standard
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

In this patent infringement action, the plaintiff sought production of the defendant's document retention and document destruction policies. The


ITC Reviews-In-Part And Vacates-In-Part Initial Determination That Patents-In-Suit Are Directed To Ineligible Subject Matter Under 101 In Certain Wearable Activity Tracking Devices (337-TA-973)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

On September 7, 2016, the International Trade Commission ("the Commission") issued a notice and order in Certain Wearable Activity Tracking Devices


“Processing System” Does Not Render Claims Indefinite
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

The Federal Circuit relied on Nautilus to preserve functional language of a method claim in a decision published last Friday. In Cox Comm, Inc. v


“Common Sense” May Not Be Enough to Support an Obviousness Rejection
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently addressed the issue of when and how “common sense” may be used to determine the


ALJ Finds No Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • September 29 2016

On September 22, 2016, Judge Lord issued the public version of her Initial Determination in Certain Activity Tracking Devices, Systems, and


‘It is unrealistic to think UK could ratify Unified Patent Court Agreement any time soon’
  • Bristows LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • September 29 2016

The Preparatory Committee of the Unified Patent Court reported earlier this month that its work will be finished by the time of its meeting in