We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,474

K-State agricultural lender survey indicates cautious lenders, but continued expectations of strong farm loan volume
  • Husch Blackwell LLP
  • USA
  • July 2 2015

In June, the Department of Agricultural Economics at Kansas State University ("K-State") released the results of its semi-annual survey of


Seventh Circuit limits construction lender’s use of title insurance policy to cover construction liens created by lender’s cutoff of funding
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2015

In a recent decision written by Judge Sykes, affirming a decision from the Western District of Wisconsin, in an issue governed by Wisconsin law, the


Nutter bank report, June 2015
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

The FDIC is seeking public comments on a proposed rule that would change the way small banks are assessed for deposit insurance. Under the June 16


Supreme Court decides disparate treatment case under Fair Housing Act
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

In a much-anticipated decision, the United States Supreme Court held on June 25, 2015, in a 5-4 decision, that disparate impact claims are cognizable


Supreme Court upholds ‘disparate impact’ under the FHA but emphasizes that claims cannot rely on statistics alone
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project


California Appellate Court holds tender not required for HBOR
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second District, recently reversed a trial court's dismissal of a complaint alleging a servicer


US Supreme Court holds disparate impact claims cognizable under FHA with limits
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2015

In a 5-4 decision yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), but


If standing is right, I don’t wanna be Wong
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

On June 18, 2015, the Eighth Circuit decided another class action case involving Missouri borrowers who took out second mortgages on their homes and


California court holds HOBR allows borrowers to be paid attorney fees for preliminary injunction
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Third District, recently vacated a trial court order denying two borrowers' motion for attorney fees


Disparate impact doctrine survives Supreme Court review
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

After years of debate and false starts, the Supreme Court has held that the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) permits disparate impact claims. In Texas