We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 251

High Court sets aside Norwich Pharmacal order served outside jurisdiction
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • September 20 2016

In AB Bank Ltd v Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC the High Court set aside a Norwich Pharmacal order made against the Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank


Claimant investors establish advisory duty against bank
  • RPC
  • Hong Kong, United Kingdom
  • September 6 2016

In the most recent so-called 'mis-selling' case in Hong Kong, three claimant investors succeeded in establishing that a bank owed them a contractual


When does a bank have a duty to advise on onerous contractual terms?
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • August 16 2016

In Finch v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc and Promontoria Holding 87 BV v Finch the High Court recently considered whether a lender owes a duty, in contract


The unexpected effect of Brexit on Part 36 offers
  • RPC
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • August 5 2016

Insurers may need to check the adequacy of any Part 36 offer they have made in claims where the claimant seeks damages in a foreign currency and may


Winning the battle but losing the war
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • July 22 2016

We have previously commented on the need for claimants to establish all elements of a claim (duty, breach, causation and loss) if they want to


Tiuta International Ltd (in liquidation) v De Villiers Surveyors
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • July 6 2016

The Court of Appeal recently overturned a first instance decision in an application for summary judgment in the matter of Tiuta International Ltd (in


High Court encourages use of FOS to resolve disputes
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • June 24 2016

The Commercial Court has encouraged the use of the FOS to resolve disputes, by granting a stay to enable claimants to benefit from what it described


Sivagnanam v Barclays Bank plc (unreported)
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • June 3 2016

The Commercial Court held that where a company had entered into interest rate hedging products with a bank, the company's sole shareholder and


WW Property Investments Limited v National Westminster Bank plc
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • June 3 2016

The High Court confirmed that interest rate hedging agreements are not wagers in law where at least one party enters into the contract for a genuine


Marme Inversiones v Royal Bank of Scotland, HSH Nordbank, AG Bayerische Landesbank, ING Bank and Caixa D’Estalvis
  • RPC
  • United Kingdom
  • June 3 2016

Property tycoon Glenn Maud has brought an £800m claim against the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) over alleged losses arising from Euribor rigging. The