We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 9,939

Tender not required for a “dual tracking” claim
  • Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Many claims based on flawed foreclosure sales never get out of the starting gates because the borrower fails to allege a pre-lawsuit "tender" of all


Supreme Court decides disparate treatment case under Fair Housing Act
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

In a much-anticipated decision, the United States Supreme Court held on June 25, 2015, in a 5-4 decision, that disparate impact claims are cognizable


Supreme Court upholds ‘disparate impact’ under the FHA but emphasizes that claims cannot rely on statistics alone
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project


Disparate impact under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act after Inclusive Communities
  • BuckleySandler LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

On June 25, the Supreme Court in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. held that disparate-impact


Ninth Circuit holds debt collector did not violate FDCPA by charging pre-judgment interest
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held that a debt collector's demand seeking 10 percent interest that was not expressly


California Appellate Court holds tender not required for HBOR
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second District, recently reversed a trial court's dismissal of a complaint alleging a servicer


US Supreme Court holds disparate impact claims cognizable under FHA with limits
  • Maurice Wutscher LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2015

In a 5-4 decision yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), but


Disparate impact doctrine survives Supreme Court review
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

After years of debate and false starts, the Supreme Court has held that the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) permits disparate impact claims. In Texas


Supreme Court recognizes disparate impact under Fair Housing Act
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that disparate impact claims are available under the Fair Housing Act (FHA). In a 5-4 decision, a deeply divided


Eighth Circuit upholds district court’s dismissal of Missouri Second Mortgage Loan Act class action
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

In Thomas v. U.S. Bank National Association et al., No. 14-2265 (8th Cir. June 18, 2015), the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court's order