We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,980

Suing the state: class action or “mass action”
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2014

Wisconsin's court of appeals recently clarified the extent to which class-action lawsuits may be brought against Wisconsin governmental entitles


New Government legislation programme: industry & sector specific breakdown- SpringSummer 2015
  • William Fry
  • Ireland
  • January 16 2015

The Irish Government has published its legislation programme for the SpringSummer 2015 parliamentary session. There are 32 Bills which are currently


Michigan Court of Appeals approves health benefits for unrelated co-residents of state employees
  • Miller Canfield PLC
  • USA
  • January 16 2013

On January 8, 2013, the Michigan Court of Appeals, in a two-to-one decision, held that the Michigan Civil Service Commission could extend eligibility


Blaneys Ontario Court of Appeal Summaries
  • Blaney McMurtry LLP
  • Canada
  • October 21 2016

Below are the summaries for this week's civil decisions of the Court of Appeal. There were two interesting civil decisions. In Canada Post Corporation


Judge puts off decision on whether receiver’s CalPERS benefits are unconstitional
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 20 2013

On January 23, 2008, the federal court appointed J. Clark Kelso as a receiver for California’s prison health care system. In 2011, a taxpayer filed a


Ontario budget 2013 more pension reform to come
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada
  • May 2 2013

In today's budget, the Ontario government announced that it is continuing with its pension reform agenda, but it is not all "old news". Perhaps of


Shaking down the thunder from the sky: Notre Dame’s challenge to the contraception mandate
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • February 28 2014

The Supreme Court will inevitably decide to what extent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act protects religiously affiliated employers from


DOMA held unconstitutional
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2013

The Defense of Marriage Act, which defines "marriage" and "spouse" as excluding same-sex partners, was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court today in


Supreme Court rules DOMA unconstitutional
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has just ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act "is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is


In Windsor, Supreme Court finds federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2013

By a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled today that Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional insofar as it purports