We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 28

Have you assumed pension termination liability? Long arm of the U.S. PBGC reaches non-U.S. parent
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • April 20 2012

One of the most difficult rules for our non-U.S. based clients to accept is controlled group liability for plan termination under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA


The inadvertent fiduciary: Mass Mutual crosses the line
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • June 16 2014

Plan fiduciaries are held to the highest performance standards and can be personally liable for breaches of fiduciary responsibility. Because of this


Canadian equity compensation 101
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • March 14 2012

As US multinational companies (and their related cross-border activities) continue to grow and expand, US lawyers and human resources professionals may be asked to consider issues related to equity compensation for their Canadian-based employees more and more


IRS simplifies rules for participants in Canadian plans or does it?
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • October 23 2014

Under the US-Canada Income Tax Treaty, U.S. taxpayers who participate in Canadian registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs) and registered


The ABC’s of target benefit plans part II
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • March 17 2014

This is my second blog post in a series regarding target benefit plans (TBPs) (for Part I, which provides a general overview of TBPs, see my March 10


DOMA's demise has broad impact on U.S. benefit plans: prepare for new claims and practices
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • June 27 2013

When you heard about the invalidation of the part of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defined marriage as between a man and a woman by the


U.S. employee benefit plans must comply with Supreme Court’s DOMA decision: what to do now and what is still undecided
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • July 8 2013

When the United States Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) provision defining marriage under federal law as between a man


The mistaken fiduciary: can you correct overpayments to U.S. retirees?
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • July 7 2014

Even the best run pension plans occasionally pay retirees the wrong amount due to errors in employee classification, or calculating participant


De-risking your U.S. pension: choices and challenges
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • December 11 2012

Defined benefit plan sponsors have become very focused on ways to control their asset volatility and to remove pension liabilities from their balance sheets


Your 401(k) plan and the shape of the earth
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • March 4 2014

I used to work with a very smart lawyer who said that he could give a legal opinion that the world was flat if his qualifying language was not limited