We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 720

When a regulator calls
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • Australia
  • August 26 2015

In recent times, regulators have been flexing their muscles by prosecuting those who came before them using information obtained under compulsion


Insider trading: what do you know?
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • August 21 2015

Unlike the market misconduct prohibitions in the Corporations Act, the insider trading prohibition does not involve strict liability. There is a very


Quantifying a claim for restitution in cases of fraud? Recent Federal Court case provides direction
  • Barry.Nilsson. Lawyers
  • Australia
  • July 16 2015

In the recent Federal Court decision of Shaw Building Group Pty Ltd v Narayan (No 2), Justice Foster discussed the relevant principles for


The state of play in criminal and regulatory prosecutions in the post-Barbaro world
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • June 23 2015

It is common practice that if a defendant to a criminal or regulatory prosecution indicates their intention to plead guilty to charges, they will


ICAC v Cunneen: what does this mean for the investigatory powers of the ICAC?
  • Maddocks
  • Australia
  • June 16 2015

The recent High Court decision of Independent Commission Against Corruption v Cunneen 2015 HCA 14 (ICAC v Cunneen) is important in clarifying the


More ICAC conundrums
  • McCabes
  • Australia
  • May 18 2015

The decision of the High Court in the recent ICAC v Cunneen appeal has raised all sorts of intriguing legislative, political, policy and


Proportionate liability: the High Court resolves the dispute
  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • Australia
  • May 14 2015

Yesterday, in Selig v Wealthsure 2015 HCA 18, the High Court resolved the conflict between two Full Federal Court decisions concerning the


Court comes down hard on Young insider trading offenders: DPP (Cth) v Hill and Kamay 2015 VSC 86
  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • Australia
  • April 30 2015

In Australia's "worst instance of insider trading to have come before the courts", the Supreme Court of Victoria has come down hard on the Young


ICAC v Cunneen: implications for corruption watchdogs
  • Clayton Utz
  • Australia
  • April 30 2015

The High Court's ruling in Cunneen seems to restrict the jurisdiction of ICAC to investigate the conduct of third parties in connection with the


ICAC’s wings clipped by High Court in Cunneen appeal: what next?
  • McCabes
  • Australia
  • April 24 2015

The High Court has dismissed the appeal of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (the Commission) from the NSW Court of Appeal's decision