We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,214

The Supreme Court has spoken: OEMs and trademark use
  • Dorsey & Whitney LLP
  • China
  • April 6 2016

China has been the factory of the world for the past few decades. Countless foreign brand owners have taken advantage of the low-cost manufacturing


Jiangsu High Court: whether OEM export constitutes trademark infringement shall be decided case-by-case according to the circumstances
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • April 6 2016

On December 18, 2015, the Jiangsu High Court rendered a decision in an OEM export case, overturning the non-infringement judgment made by the


Corporate Crime Update - March 2016 - United States
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Cuba, USA, Uzbekistan
  • March 31 2016

We reported in December that VimpelCom, the Dutch telecommunications company, made $900 million Accounting provision relating to bribery


Newsletter n 23- 01 Fevrier 2016 - 29 Fevrier 2016
  • Fidal
  • Belgium, China, European Union, Germany
  • March 30 2016

Par son arrêt du 21 janvier 2016, la Cour de Justice de l’Union européenne a répondu à une question préjudicielle soulevée par une juridiction


Newsletter No. 23- 01 February 2016 - 29 February 2016
  • Fidal
  • Belgium, China, European Union, Germany
  • March 29 2016

In its judgment of 21 January 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union answered a request for a preliminary ruling submitted by a Lithuanian


Jiangsu High Court: whether OEM export constitutes trademark infringement shall be decided case-by-case according to the circumstances
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • March 29 2016

On December 18, 2015, the Jiangsu High Court rendered a decision in an OEM export case, overturning the non-infringement judgment made by the


Legal Flash Shanghai March 2016 - Singapore International Arbitration Center opens representative office in Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone
  • Cuatrecasas Gonçalves Pereira
  • China, Singapore
  • March 17 2016

On January 25, the Singapore International Arbitration Center announced the opening of a representative office in the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone


New Antidumping Duty Petition on R-134A from China
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • China, USA
  • March 7 2016

On March 3, 2016, an antidumping (AD) petition was filed with the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) and U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC


ICC opens in Shanghai’s Free Trade Zone
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • China, Hong Kong
  • March 3 2016

Following in the footsteps of the HKIAC and SIAC, 24 February 2016 the Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) announced


Supreme People's Court rules OEM export does not constitute trademark infringement
  • Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency
  • China
  • February 29 2016

On November 26 2015 the Supreme People's Court rendered a civil judgment (Civil Retrial 382014) which ended the four-year legal battle over the