We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 85

Federal Circuit upholds Commission's $11 million penalty on Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. for violating exclusion and cease and desist orders
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 16 2012

On February 8, 2012 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in the decision Ninestar Technology Co. v. International Trade Commission, affirmed the Commission's imposition of a penalty of over $11 million on Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. (Ninestar) and two of its U.S. subsidiaries for their continued importation and sales of refurbished ink cartridges subject to exclusion and cease and desist orders


Chief ALJ denies MyKey motion to amend complaint
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 16 2012

Chief ALJ Bullock, on remand from the Commission, denied Complainant MyKey's motion to amend the complaint to add Diskology LLC as a respondent, and to amend the notice of investigation in Inv. No. 337-TA-799, Certain Computer Forensic Devices and Products Containing The Same


ITC institutes Inv. No. 827, Certain Portable Communication Devices
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 13 2012

On January 13, 2012 the ITC voted to institute an investigation of certain portable communication devices


New complaint filed by Rovi
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 16 2011

Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., United Video Properties, Inc., Gemstar Development Corporation, and Index System Inc. filed a letter on November 15, 2011, requesting that the International Trade Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 covering Certain Products Containing Interactive Program Guide and Parental Controls Technology


Target date set in Inv. no. 337-TA-808
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 5 2011

ALJ E. James Gildea issued an Initial Determination on October 4, 2011 that, among other things, sets the target date for Certain Electronic Devices with Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Related Software, 337-TA-808


Federal Circuit affirms Commission decision in Inv. No. 337-TA-655
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 12 2011

On October 11, 2011, the Federal Circuit, by a 2-1 majority in TianRui Group Co. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, No. 2010-1395, affirmed the Commission’s ruling in Inv. No. 337-TA-655, In the Matter of Certain Cast Steel Railway Wheels, Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same and Certain Products Containing Same


Chief ALJ Bullock rejects summary determination motions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 28 2012

Chief ALJ Bullock has rejected three motions for summary determination of non-infringement by respondents PHE, Inc., Evolved Novelties, Inc., and Momentum Management, LLC in Inv. No. 337-TA-823, Certain Kinesiotherapy Devices and Components Thereof


ITC votes to institute Inv. no. 825, certain silicon microphone packages and products containing same
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 9 2012

On January 9, 2012, the Commission voted to institute an investigation of certain silicon microphone packages and products containing same


Claim construction order issues in Inv. 337-TA-796
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 6 2012

On March 6, 2012, ALJ Pender issued an order construing terms of asserted patents in Inv. 337-TA-796, Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof


Commission declines to review determination granting microsoft's motion on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 7 2012

On March 7, 2012, the Commission issued a notice of its decision not to review the ALJ Essex’s initial determination granting complaint Microsoft Corporation’s motion for summary determination on the economic prong of the domestic injury requirement in Inv