We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 69

More legal implications from the West Coast Ports labor dispute (or, what to do if your supply chain contract does not address disaster) (or, yet another goofy UCC provision)
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • March 31 2015

Last week, we discussed the legal fallout from the West Coast Ports dispute. In particular, we talked about how a force majeure clause in a supply


Supply chain law: 2014 year of the recall! (or, recalling recalls) (or, the mother of all warranty claims)
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • February 20 2015

Earlier this month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) , the federal agency responsible for overseeing automotive safety


Legal fallout from the West Coast Ports labor dispute (or, how to take risk into account in supply chain contracts) (or, we like meaty meat)
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • March 26 2015

Although the West Coast Ports labor dispute has more or less resolved, the consequences continue to be felt across supply chains both in the U.S. and


Dalmare Spa V Union Maritime Ltd 2013 1 LLR 509
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • May 22 2013

Recently the High Court in England and Wales took the opportunity to rule that the condition of a second hand vessel, sold pursuant to the terms of


Court of Appeal reaffirms rule that without prejudice material may not be used as an aid to interpretation
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • March 30 2010

In the case of Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Limited, the Court of Appeal has overturned the High Court's ruling and reaffirmed the rule that without prejudice material may not be put before a court to assist in the interpretation of a settlement agreement


Without prejudice exchanges admissible for interpretation of a settlement agreement
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • August 27 2009

In the case of Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Limited & 3 Others, the High Court has ruled in favour of allowing without prejudice exchanges to be adduced as evidence where there is a dispute over the interpretation of a settlement agreement


Andalusia High Court of Justice sentence, 20 October 2009
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • Spain
  • January 29 2010

This sentence settles the appeal made by the entity NUEVOS ESPACIOS COMERCIALES, S.A., against the Order dated 20 September 2007 of the Tourism, Commerce and Sports Board


Liability of the transport consignee
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • Spain
  • March 12 2008

In this judgement, the full session of the First Chamber of the Spanish High Court analysed the liability of the transport consignee, determining how to assist shipping companies against those interested in the cargo when the cargo is subject to damages or losses as a result of an inadequate execution of the transport contract, a judgement that represents a radical turn with regards to the jurisprudence that had been previously followed


Competition Appeal Tribunal dismisses ECSL’s claim for damages
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • December 31 2009

English Welsh & Scottish Railways Limited ("EWS") was found to have abused its dominant position in the market for haulage of coal by rail in Great Britain


Improper fines from red light cameras do not violate the Takings Clause - but they may violate the Ohio Constitution
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • November 17 2010

The Sixth Circuit has given red light cameras a rare victory in Ohio