We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 77

GAFTA seller’s truly ‘golden victory’: Supreme Court reduces damages from US$3 million to US$5
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • July 28 2015

“Commercial certainty is undoubtedly important but it can rarely be thought to justify an award of substantial damages to someone who has not


The unfortunate event test aggregating incidents
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • September 17 2015

Much has been written about the judicial inquiry into whether separate incidents may be aggregated as a single accident or occurrence under various


Is positional loss recoverable?
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • September 30 2015

In Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA v MT Maritime Management BV (MTM Hong Kong) 2015 UKSC 43, the High Court awarded the shipowner damages for


More legal implications from the West Coast Ports labor dispute (or, what to do if your supply chain contract does not address disaster) (or, yet another goofy UCC provision)
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • March 31 2015

Last week, we discussed the legal fallout from the West Coast Ports dispute. In particular, we talked about how a force majeure clause in a supply


Legal fallout from the West Coast Ports labor dispute (or, how to take risk into account in supply chain contracts) (or, we like meaty meat)
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • March 26 2015

Although the West Coast Ports labor dispute has more or less resolved, the consequences continue to be felt across supply chains both in the U.S. and


Supply chain law: 2014 year of the recall! (or, recalling recalls) (or, the mother of all warranty claims)
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • February 20 2015

Earlier this month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) , the federal agency responsible for overseeing automotive safety


Dalmare Spa V Union Maritime Ltd 2013 1 LLR 509
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • May 22 2013

Recently the High Court in England and Wales took the opportunity to rule that the condition of a second hand vessel, sold pursuant to the terms of


Remoteness... forseeability...recovery of future loss...revisited
  • Squire Sanders Hammonds
  • United Kingdom
  • August 8 2011

The Court of Appeal in a recent case, Conarken Group Ltd and another v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd 2011 EWCA Civ 644 gave a useful restatement of the laws on the foreseeability and remoteness of economic loss arising from negligent property damage


Enron Coal Services Limited (in liquidation) v English, Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • March 16 2009

A claim brought by Enron Coal Services Limited (ECSL) has been allowed to continue despite English, Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited (EWS) petitioning the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) to strike out their claim on the grounds of rule 40 of the Tribunal Rules


Freight cargo customers seek remedies from the UK High Court
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • October 30 2008

A US-based law firm has initiated a representative action before the UK High Court against British Airways on behalf of indirect and direct purchasers of air cargo services that suffered losses as a result of the airline’s role in a price-fixing cartel