We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 7,585

Antitrust and competition - the EU weekly briefing (23 November 2015)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • November 23 2015

Commission opens two in-depth State aid investigations into French plans to remunerate electricity capacity. On 13 November 2015, the European

La mauvaise foi et les clauses de réserve dans les documents d’appel d’offres
  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2015

Les clauses de réserve qui stipulent que le donneur d’ouvrage a la discrétion de n’accepter ni la plus basse ni aucune

Switching planning permissions - challenging pooled contributions
  • 9 Stone Buildings
  • United Kingdom
  • November 21 2015

A developer under pressure in order to obtain a planning permission speedily may have to accept a planning obligation to make a pooled contribution

Tendering decision from Alberta highlights importance of planning a bid evaluation
  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • Canada
  • November 20 2015

A recent tendering decision from the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Elan Construction Limited v. South Fish Creek Recreational Association, 2015

On remand, Carter district court ruling raises more first-to-file questions
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2015

As we reported previously, earlier this year the Supreme Court held in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. et al. v. U.S. ex rel. Carter that the

Hospice false claims case helps clarify law
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2015

Following a trial in which a national hospice chain (AseraCare) was initially found to have submitted false claims, the Court ordered a new trial. In

First final decision on “no spy guarantee” issued by the Higher Court of Duesseldorf
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Germany
  • November 20 2015

The Higher Regional Court of Duesseldorf has issued its first and long awaited decision on the admissibility of a “no spy guarantee” requirement for

Protections against subcontractor defaults
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2015

Among every construction project's worst nightmares is the subcontractor default, where a particular trade subcontractor cannot meet its contractual

U.S. Attorney Manual revised to reflect Yates Memorandum’s focus on individuals
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 19 2015

On September 9, 2015, Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates issued a memorandum outlining the Department of Justice's increased focused on