We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 819

California’s highest court refuses to review denial of coverage under contamination products insurance policy for ground beef recall
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • May 29 2015

On May 20, 2015, the California Supreme Court denied Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd.’s (Windsor’s) petition for review of the decision of the


Expect focus - volume III, Summer 2014
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • September 16 2014

EXPECTFOCUS is a quarterly review of developments in the insurance and financial services industry, provided on a complimentary basis to clients and


Class action round-up - spring 2015
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • June 9 2015

On April 27, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robinssetting the stage for an important decision on whether a


Contamination products insurance does not cover recall of ingredients supplied to insured manufacturer
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

In Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd v. The Underwriters of Lloyds of London, et al. (2015) 2015 Cal.App. LEXIS 195, the California Court of Appeal


Eighth Circuit sends issue over “accidental product contamination” to jury
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2014

The question of coverage for costs relating to a voluntary recall of breakfast sandwiches should be decided by a jury, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court


Class action round-up - spring 2014
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2014

In a mortgage-related row, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Central District of California’s grant of summary judgment in favor of several bank


Top reasons the JPML has denied centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 9 2014

Since May 2011, here are the most-cited reasons the JPML has denied Section 1407 centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases: The


Insurance policy ambiguous; broad coverage could be available for tainted peanut butter claims
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2011

A divided Delaware Supreme Court has determined that ConAgra's insurance contract is ambiguous and therefore might provide broader coverage, with a lower "retained limit" or deductible, for claims arising out of an alleged Salmonella outbreak involving the company's peanut butter


Court finds coverage for consequential damages arising from product recall
  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • USA
  • January 16 2013

A Minnesota Federal District Court Judge recently ruled that the insured is entitled to defense and indemnification under its commercial liability


Are you covered for food product recalls?
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2014

Food product recalls, whether the result of misbranding, adulteration or another source, are showing no signs of slowing down. According to