We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,149

Federal Court in Texas Holds Attorneys’ Fees Incurred by Seller Seeking Indemnity from Manufacturer for Product Liability not “Damages” Under CGL Policy
  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • USA
  • March 6 2017

A federal court in Texas found that attorneys' fees awarded to a manufacturer for defense of a suit for indemnity by a retailer are not "damages"


March 2017 International Trade Compliance Update
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Canada, European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • March 7 2017

On 22 February 2017, the WTO announced that the first multilateral deal concluded in the 21 year history of the World Trade Organization entered into


Product Recall for Food Contamination Claims - Is There Coverage?
  • SandRun Risk
  • USA
  • November 18 2016

When dealing with insurance coverage associated with a product recall and food contamination claims, there are certain policy exclusions and arguments


February 2017 International Trade Compliance Update
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Canada, China, European Union, Global, United Kingdom, USA
  • February 20 2017

On 27 January 2017, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2339 (2017) with respect to the situation in the Central African Republic. The Security


Expect focus - volume III, Summer 2014
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • September 16 2014

EXPECTFOCUS is a quarterly review of developments in the insurance and financial services industry, provided on a complimentary basis to clients and


Top reasons the JPML has denied centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 9 2014

Since May 2011, here are the most-cited reasons the JPML has denied Section 1407 centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases: The


Insurance policy ambiguous; broad coverage could be available for tainted peanut butter claims
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2011

A divided Delaware Supreme Court has determined that ConAgra's insurance contract is ambiguous and therefore might provide broader coverage, with a lower "retained limit" or deductible, for claims arising out of an alleged Salmonella outbreak involving the company's peanut butter


First-party property coverage issues arising from contaminated products claims
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2007

A company that destroys its inventories of goods or products due to contamination or some other defect sometimes makes a claim under its first-party property insurance, especially if it has not purchased recall or similar specialty insurance


Insurer seeks declaration in coverage dispute over diacetyl litigation
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 7 2011

Arch Specialty Insurance Co. has filed a declaratory judgment action in a New York state court against a company identified as a distributor of food product ingredients, including the butter-flavoring chemical diacetyl


Insurance company disputes obligation to provide diacetyl damages or defense
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2013

A company that issued Citrus and Allied Essences Ltd. a commercial umbrella insurance policy in 2006 and 2007 has filed suit in a New York state