We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,245

When is the presence of Lactobacillus acidophilus an occurrence under a CGL policy?
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • November 6 2014

In Wisconsin Pharmacal Co. v. Nebraska Cultures of California, No. 13AP613 (Wis. Ct. App. Oct. 29, 2014), the Wisconsin Court of Appeals analyzed the


Contamination products insurance does not cover recall of ingredients supplied to insured manufacturer
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2015

The California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District held that a contamination products policy does not cover ingredients obtained from a


California appellate court finds no malicious product tampering coverage for Westland’s ground beef
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • February 11 2015

In 2008, Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd. (Windsor) purchased WestlandHallmark Meat Company's (Westland's) ground beef as an ingredient to be used


Insurance coverage considerations for alleged mislabeling of herbal and dietary supplements
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2015

The New York Attorney General recently ordered four major retailers to stop selling herbal supplements that it alleged did not contain labeled


Professional services exclusion precludes coverage for design defect claims
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2013

Applying Nevada law, a federal district court has held that an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify claims alleging damage from design defects


Navigating the product liability coverage obstacle course
  • Nossaman LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2015

High-tech companies are well advised to purchase "errors and omissions" insurance to protect against customer claims based on defective products or


California Court adopts expansive reading of contamination and product recall coverage
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • October 22 2015

Two weeks ago in Foster Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138609, 2015 WL 5920289 (E.D.Cal., Oct


Georgia Court of Appeals holds pollution exclusion does not apply to lead-based paint
  • Rogers Townsend & Thomas PC
  • USA
  • May 12 2015

In a March 31, 2015 opinion, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that an absolute pollution exclusion provision in a CGL policy did not exclude


California district court finds CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement satisfied and no local controversy alleged; denies motion to remand
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

The Southern District of California denied a plaintiff's motion to remand a putative class action removed pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act


New York Federal Court finds CGL insurer must defend third-party product recall claims
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • August 18 2015

A federal court in New York recently found that litigation concerning damages related to a third party's product recall required a defense under a