We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,116

Class action round-up - spring 2015
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • June 9 2015

On April 27, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robinssetting the stage for an important decision on whether a

California’s highest court refuses to review denial of coverage under contamination products insurance policy for ground beef recall
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • May 29 2015

On May 20, 2015, the California Supreme Court denied Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd.’s (Windsor’s) petition for review of the decision of the

Insurance coverage considerations for alleged mislabeling of herbal and dietary supplements
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2015

The New York Attorney General recently ordered four major retailers to stop selling herbal supplements that it alleged did not contain labeled

Food court report: food recall insurance - a case study
  • Keller and Heckman LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2015

A recent decision interpreting a "food recall" insurance policy (technically a product contamination insurance policy or "PCI" for short) provides

Food recall events: the importance of evaluating your insurance coverage before a voluntary and mandatory food recall
  • McCarter & English LLP
  • USA
  • October 21 2015

Food recalls are on the rise as consumer protection regulations become more stringent, and they can be costly events. There can be significant

Foster poultry farms: concerns for contaminated products insurers
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2015

On 9 October 2015, summary judgment was ordered against insurers in the coverage case of Foster Poultry Farms v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's. This

Court finds insurer must cover Foster Farms’ Salmonella losses
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2015

A California federal court has granted Foster Farms' request for declaratory judgment finding that Lloyd's of London must cover $14 million in costs

New York Federal Court finds CGL insurer must defend third-party product recall claims
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • August 18 2015

A federal court in New York recently found that litigation concerning damages related to a third party's product recall required a defense under a

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules That Inclusion of Defective Ingredient Does Not Constitute Property Damage
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2016

In Wisconsin Pharmacal Co., LLC v. Nebraska Cultures of California, Inc., et al., 2016 Wisc. LEXIS 12 (March 1, 2016), the Wisconsin Supreme Court in

California district court finds CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement satisfied and no local controversy alleged; denies motion to remand
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

The Southern District of California denied a plaintiff's motion to remand a putative class action removed pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act