We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,233

The new frontier for insurance: space flight
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2013

Gov. Martinez emphasized that the legislation still leaves room for injured space flight participants to bring suit, at least in cases where the

Eleventh Circuit reverses decision to exclude plaintiff’s experts
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • April 19 2013

In United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Whirlpool Corp., 704 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2013) (No. 11-15011), the plaintiff insurer brought this appeal from the

Weekly Washington healthcare update
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • April 1 2013

Last week, Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Boustany wrote a letter to HHS Secretary Sebelius inquiring about a voter registration

Class action round-up - spring 2014
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2014

In a mortgage-related row, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Central District of California’s grant of summary judgment in favor of several bank

Another listeria outbreak reminds food industry to revisit insurance program
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2014

On December 19, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that U.S. consumers not eat any commercially produced

Seeking (and finding) coverage for Proposition 65 claims
  • Gilbert LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2014

Navigating California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986better known as Proposition 65is becoming an increasingly

Seventh Circuit says no duty to defend four Loko maker
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 20 2013

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that Phusion Projects' commercial liability insurance carriers have no duty to defend the company

Connecticut court: 19 leaky pools means 19 occurrences under insurance policy
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • April 25 2014

A Connecticut federal court expanded the amount of insurance potentially available to an insured in a case involving coverage for 19 defective

Total Recall: Maximizing the Return on Product RecallContamination Insurance
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • October 10 2016

If you believe the news, I may be lucky to make it out of the driveway alive on my morning commute tomorrow. That microwave-ready triple egg breakfast

Professional services exclusion precludes coverage for design defect claims
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2013

Applying Nevada law, a federal district court has held that an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify claims alleging damage from design defects