We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 902

23andMe insurer claims no duty to defend company
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2014

The insurance carrier that issued a "ProductsCompleted Operations Liability and Professional Liability Policy for Life Sciences" policy to 23andMe


Foster Farms sues insurers over definition of “recall”
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2014

Poultry manufacturer Foster Farms has filed an amended complaint in its lawsuit against its Lloyd's of London insurers, which had rejected its $14.2


Pennsylvania Supreme Court declines to review pro-policyholder decision; contrary arguments possible
  • McCarter & English LLP
  • USA
  • October 20 2014

Although the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to review the pro-policyholder decision on insurers' duty to defend manufacturing claims, the


Expect focus - volume III, Summer 2014
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • September 16 2014

EXPECTFOCUS is a quarterly review of developments in the insurance and financial services industry, provided on a complimentary basis to clients and


Court rejects workers comp insurer’s challenge to big pharma
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • September 16 2014

Pharmaceutical manufacturers that promote off-label uses for prescription drugs have become litigation targets for third-party payorsespecially


Top reasons the JPML has denied centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 9 2014

Since May 2011, here are the most-cited reasons the JPML has denied Section 1407 centralization of products liability and salesmarketing cases: The


General liability insurer must defend manufacturing defect claims; gist of the action doctrine rejected
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • December 10 2013

A Pennsylvania appellate court in Indalex, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., No. 612 WDA 2012 (Dec. 3, 2013), found that a general liability


How insurance works with labeling and duty-to-warn lawsuits
  • Gilbert LLP
  • USA
  • January 28 2014

Labeling and duty-to-warn cases continue to emerge as a key area of risk for food and beverage companies. In light of this trend, food and beverage


Eighth Circuit says likelihood of MSG to cause harm is factual matter
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2014

In a dispute over commercial liability insurance coverage, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a trial court erred in deciding, as a


Eighth Circuit sends issue over “accidental product contamination” to jury
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2014

The question of coverage for costs relating to a voluntary recall of breakfast sandwiches should be decided by a jury, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court