We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 995

Clarification of the economic loss rule may greatly expand tort claims in construction litigation
  • Smith Currie & Hancock
  • USA
  • May 31 2013

The economic loss rule is a judicially-created doctrine that sets forth the circumstances under which a tort action is prohibited if the only damages


Class action round-up - spring 2014
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2014

In a mortgage-related row, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Central District of California’s grant of summary judgment in favor of several bank


Product recall exclusion held not to bar coverage for recall of tainted milk
  • Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2014

On March 18, 2014, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling by a Minnesota federal judge that Main Street Ingredients LLC (Main Street), a


Professional services exclusion precludes coverage for design defect claims
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 14 2013

Applying Nevada law, a federal district court has held that an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify claims alleging damage from design defects


Sidley Austin LLP global pricing newsletter - volume three 2014
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • Brazil, Canada, China, European Union, France, Germany, India, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 15 2014

On October 21, 2013, Brazil’s National Agency of Supplemental Health enacted Normative Resolution 388, which mandated that all private healthcare


Are you covered for food product recalls?
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2014

Food product recalls, whether the result of misbranding, adulteration or another source, are showing no signs of slowing down. According to


Contamination products insurance does not cover recall of ingredients supplied to insured manufacturer
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2015

The California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District held that a contamination products policy does not cover ingredients obtained from a


California appellate court finds no malicious product tampering coverage for Westland’s ground beef
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • February 11 2015

In 2008, Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd. (Windsor) purchased WestlandHallmark Meat Company's (Westland's) ground beef as an ingredient to be used


National Union Fire ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Ins. Co.
  • Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2015

In National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A. V. Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Ins. Co., __ Cal. Rptr. 3d __, 2015 WL 459231 (Feb. 4, 2015


Insurance coverage considerations for alleged mislabeling of herbal and dietary supplements
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2015

The New York Attorney General recently ordered four major retailers to stop selling herbal supplements that it alleged did not contain labeled