We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 12,321

PewCSPI report calls on USDA to modernize meat inspection
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 24 2014

The Pew Charitable Trusts and Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) have released an October 2014 report urging the U.S. Department of


Pom Wonderful drops Ninth Circuit appeal of state claims filed against Coca-Cola
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • October 28 2014

On September 19, 2014, Pom Wonderful, LLC dropped its Ninth Circuit appeal of a ruling that dismissed its state deceptive advertising and unfair


Hershey's and marijuana
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

With the legalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington, there has been an increase in entrepreneurial endeavors associated with the sale of


Magnuson-Moss won’t cover a manufactured home in the Sixth Circuit
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • November 7 2014

When is a “home” a “house” and not covered by federal consumer protection law? According to a split Sixth Circuit decision issued last week, when a


FSIS and the new environment for labeling claims
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • USA
  • November 7 2014

Like the broader federal inspection program in which it is housed, the Food Safety and Inspection Service’s (FSIS’s) prior labeling approval system


California court interprets pom decision, allows Lanham Act suit to continue
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • October 24 2014

Relying on the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in POM Wonderful v. Coca-Cola, a federal court judge in California found that FDA


"Generic" logic helps branded drug achieve dismissal
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • November 6 2014

A federal district court has held that design defect claims against a brand pharmaceutical manufacturer are preempted by federal law. Booker v


Appellate Court holds that dram shop statutes do not protect Four Loko producer from lawsuit
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 7 2014

Reversing a lower-court decision, a California appeals court has ruled that state dram shop statutesmeant to protect some sellers of alcohol


NAD criticizes philosophy’s study supporting “Time in a Bottle” anti-aging Serum ads
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 23 2014

The National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus has recommended that Philosophy, Inc. discontinue some advertising


What you ate for breakfast today could be recalled tomorrow: FSIS’s retroactive recall model
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
  • USA
  • November 10 2014

The growing trend of retroactive recalls for already distributed food products calls into question commonly held beliefs about food safety. Americans