We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 15,618

USDA schedules mid-June meeting to discuss Codex positions
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service has announced a June 17, 2015, public meeting in Washington, D.C. to provide


Pennsylvania product liability Azzarello is dead, long live?
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

Bexis is pretty pleased this morning. Almost eighteen years ago, to the day, he filed his first brief with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court challenging


“Made in the USA” update: California law upheld and FTC closes investigations
  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • USA
  • April 23 2015

A California federal court denied a motion to dismiss challenging California's strict law regulating the use of "Made in the USA" claims on


Vermont AG adopts rule mandating “produced with genetic engineering” label
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell has reportedly adopted a final rule implementing the state's new law requiring the labeling of foods


Consumer organizations allege USDA violated procedure with contaminated-compost rule
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

The Center for Food Safety, Center for Environmental Health and Beyond Pesticides have filed a lawsuit against the leaders of the U.S. Department of


Breaking news II - Tincher decided in Pennsylvania - Azzarello overruled
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

This is as short as the Tincher majority opinion (137 pp.) is long. Azzarello is overruled. The preliminary judicial evaluation of "unreasonable


Second putative class action alleging unsafe arsenic levels in California wine filed in Louisiana
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

A consumer has filed a putative class action in Louisiana federal court against several California wineries alleging that their products contain


Otsuka’s orphan drug exclusivity claims: FDA rips off the band-aid early
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • April 23 2015

On April 20, 2015, FDA filed a brief in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) or Preliminary Injunction (“PI”


Wait for the “green” light before making environmentally friendly claims
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

Consumers increasingly pay a premium for environmentally friendly products. As a result, companies are expanding their green marketing claims


New York court sets aside $11 million verdict and puts the onus on plaintiffs to quantify exposures to asbestos
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • April 23 2015

On April 13, 2015, Justice Barbara Jaffe of the Supreme Court, New York County, issued a decision and order granting the motion by Ford Motor Company