We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 16,888

CPSC major ‘repair program’ is not labeled a ‘recall’
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 11 2015

On July 22, 2015, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and major furniture company IKEA jointly announced a “repair program” to address the


Children's products and the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008: a synopsis of the rules and regulations governing toy safety
  • Stinson Leonard Street LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2015

Children's products, including toys, are regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) through the Consumer Product Safety Improvement


Amarin v. FDA reaffirms that FDA restriction of truthful and non-misleading speech by pharmaceutical manufacturers is unconstitutional
  • Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • August 11 2015

On Friday, August 7, 2015, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued its much-anticipated ruling on Amarin's challenge to


Kentucky Supreme Court sets forth helpful principles on liability for punitive damages
  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • USA
  • October 5 2015

Cases in which an appellate court holds that a state’s standard for punitive liability was not satisfied even though there was sufficient evidence to


Making sense of the Daubert and summary judgment orders in a metal-on-metal hip implant Bellwether case
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • October 2 2015

We have not posted for a whilethat day job can really get in the way sometimesso we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen


US loses appeal of WTO ruling on COOL, raising risk of retaliation unless COOL is repealed
  • Hogan Lovells
  • Canada, USA
  • May 19 2015

The WTO Appellate Body on May 18, 2015, publicly released a report upholding earlier findings that the United States has violated WTO rules in


MN judge orders recall of accused products
  • Fredrikson & Byron PA
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

When should a company facing charges of patent infringement be required to recall the accused products? A recent District of Minnesota decision noted


WTO appellate body strikes down US country-of-origin labeling requirement; US house poised to repeal
  • Mayer Brown LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

The World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body has issued its long-awaited report rejecting US efforts to modify meat labeling requirements. In


OEHHA to consider modifying Prop 65 safe harbor levels for lead
  • Tucker Ellis
  • USA
  • August 5 2015

On July 2, 2015, the Center for Environmental Health ("CEH") submitted a petition to repeal or amend the regulatory safe harbor established for lead


Founder of Halal Co. Sentenced to Two Years in Federal Prison
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2016

The founder of Midamar, an export company charged with fraud for sending “halal” meat to Malaysia that failed to meet halal slaughtering standards