We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 44

No more "unlimited" calling and Internet services: Comwave resolves misleading telecom service and price representations
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • September 16 2016

On September 13, 2016, the Competition Bureau reached a consent agreement with Comwave Network Inc., which resolved the Bureau’s concerns over


Telus agrees to pay $7.34 million in customer rebates to resolve false and misleading advertising allegations
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • January 11 2016

On December 30, 2015, the Competition Bureau announced that it had reached a consent agreement with Telus Communications Inc., one of Canada's "Big


Red light: Competition Bureau alleges misleading advertising by car rental firms
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • March 13 2015

The Competition Bureau has filed an application with the Competition Tribunal against Aviscar and Budgetcar, and their parent company, Avis Budget


Media mergers and the Competition Bureau: is the medium the market?
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • March 9 2015

The rapid growth of digital media in recent years and the simultaneous pressures on traditional media have led to a number of fascinating media


Canadian Tire becomes even more "Canadian" with the acquisition of Pro Hockey Life
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • February 13 2014

On February 7, 2014, the Competition Bureau released a Position Statementsummarizing the approach taken in its review of the acquisition by Canadian


Divestitures required in Canadian movie theatre merger
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • October 15 2013

On October 10, 2013 the Competition Bureau issued a no-action letter in respect of the acquisition by Cineplex Inc. (Cineplex) of 24 movie theatres


Lights! Camera! No-action! Canada's Competition Bureau clears merger of Canadian film distributors
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • January 4 2013

On January 3, 2013 the Competition Bureau issued a No-Action Letter in respect of the acquisition by Canadian film distributor Entertainment One Ltd


Rogers Communications claims misleading advertising case, AMPs violate Canadian Constitution
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • March 2 2012

Rogers Communications Inc. will appear before the Ontario Superior Court in June, claiming that two aspects of the Competition Act dealing with civilly reviewable misleading advertising are unconstitutional: AMPs (administrative monetary penalties) in the millions of dollars, and the “adequate and proper” testing requirements


CTRC's vertical integration decision in broadcasting proposes controls on vertically-integrated broadcasters
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • October 31 2011

On February 1, 2011, the Competition Bureau issued a statement in respect of the proposed acquisition of CTVglobemedia Inc. by BCE Inc


Canada leads international effort to stop business directory scam
  • Stikeman Elliott LLP
  • Canada
  • August 12 2011

The Competition Bureau announced on July 28, 2011 that it had filed an action against five companies (Yellow Business Marketing Ltd