We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 32

FilmOn X, Supporters Ask D.C. Circuit to Reverse Lower Court Decision on Compulsory License Rights
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2016

Filing briefs with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, FilmOn X and its supporters asked the court to reverse a D.C. District Court decision to deny


Court holds FilmOn in contempt of injunction barring live TV streaming service
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2014

In a development that may signify an uphill battle for Aereo, Inc. in its quest to obtain compulsory licensing rights, a New York district court


Senators caution FCC on elimination of network exclusivity rules
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2015

Five members of the U.S. Senate have cautioned FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler against proceeding with plans to eliminate the FCC's network non-duplication


Court rules for DISH Network on copyright infringement claims
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2015

DISH Network was handed a partial legal victory in a Los Angeles federal court as U.S. District Court Judge Dolly M. Gee rejected claims that DISH


House Bill would require radio broadcasters to pay music performance royalties
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • April 17 2015

To promote equity between the online and broadcast radio industries and the fair compensation of performing artists, Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and


Aereo tells Court it is entitled to compulsory copyright license
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2014

Aereo, Inc. embarked upon a new legal trail on Wednesday as it advised a New York district court that it is entitled under the compulsory licensing


Aereo files for Chapter 11 protection
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2014

Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against its method of streaming live television Broadcasts online to individual subscribers, Aereo


Supreme Court says Aereo violates broadcaster copyrights
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2014

Television broadcasters were handed a major legal victory on Wednesday as the U.S. Supreme Court decreed by a 6-3 margin that Aereo's method of


EU Advocate General says ISPs cannot be forced to block illegal downloads
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • Belgium, European Union
  • April 22 2011

In a development with implications for the European Commission (EC) investigation into net neutrality, European Court of Justice (ECJ) Advocate General (AG) Pedro Cruz Villalon concluded in an advisory opinion that a Belgian court order that forces Internet service providers (ISPs) to filter or block web content in the interest of preventing unauthorized downloads of copyrighted material violates the fundamental rights of Internet users


Aereo suspends service as congressional caucus panelists debate impact of Supreme Court ruling
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2014

Three days after it was told by the U.S. Supreme Court that its method of streaming live television programs over the Internet violates broadcasters'