We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 26

Court rules for DISH Network on copyright infringement claims
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2015

DISH Network was handed a partial legal victory in a Los Angeles federal court as U.S. District Court Judge Dolly M. Gee rejected claims that DISH


House Bill would require radio broadcasters to pay music performance royalties
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • April 17 2015

To promote equity between the online and broadcast radio industries and the fair compensation of performing artists, Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and


Court holds FilmOn in contempt of injunction barring live TV streaming service
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2014

In a development that may signify an uphill battle for Aereo, Inc. in its quest to obtain compulsory licensing rights, a New York district court


Aereo files for Chapter 11 protection
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2014

Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against its method of streaming live television Broadcasts online to individual subscribers, Aereo


Aereo tells Court it is entitled to compulsory copyright license
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2014

Aereo, Inc. embarked upon a new legal trail on Wednesday as it advised a New York district court that it is entitled under the compulsory licensing


Aereo suspends service as congressional caucus panelists debate impact of Supreme Court ruling
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • July 3 2014

Three days after it was told by the U.S. Supreme Court that its method of streaming live television programs over the Internet violates broadcasters'


Supreme Court says Aereo violates broadcaster copyrights
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2014

Television broadcasters were handed a major legal victory on Wednesday as the U.S. Supreme Court decreed by a 6-3 margin that Aereo's method of


EU Advocate General says ISPs cannot be forced to block illegal downloads
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • Belgium, European Union
  • April 22 2011

In a development with implications for the European Commission (EC) investigation into net neutrality, European Court of Justice (ECJ) Advocate General (AG) Pedro Cruz Villalon concluded in an advisory opinion that a Belgian court order that forces Internet service providers (ISPs) to filter or block web content in the interest of preventing unauthorized downloads of copyrighted material violates the fundamental rights of Internet users


Online video distributor ordered to stop rebroadcasting network TV signals
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2011

To the plaudits of the major television broadcast networks, a New York district court judge on Tuesday issued a preliminary injunction against the streaming of live broadcast television signals by online video distributor Ivi, Inc


Second Circuit clarifies the scope of safe harbor protection under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2012

On April 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an important decision clarifying the contours of the “safe harbor” provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) that limits the liability of online service providers for copyright infringement that occurs “by reason of the storage at the direction of a user of material that resides on a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service provider.”