We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 33

Street art: the everlasting divide between graffiti art and intellectual property protection
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2015

Does intellectual property law protect unsanctioned graffiti art? With the rising appreciation for street art, this is a question of growing


Court: implementing proper DMCA policy provides website operators ‘safe harbor’ from copyright infringement
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2010

Google has prevailed in the closely watched lawsuit against its YouTube website by Viacom, with the federal district court granting summary judgment in favor of Google


Court says Copyright Royalty Board can legally set webcasters' royalty payments
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2010

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that the Copyright Royalty Board is constitutional


What you don't know about IP protection for social games can hurt you
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2011

Copying within the games industry is prevalent


Automated program for playing virtual world game deemed copyright infringement
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 14 2008

In July 2008, a U.S. District Court in Arizona found on summary judgment that the use of an automated program to play a virtual world game constituted copyright infringement


Court rules copyright owners must consider fair use before DMCA takedown notice
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • September 3 2008

In Lenz v. Universal Music Corp et al. (Case 5:07-cv-03783 JF) a California District Court held that in order to issue a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) takedown notice in good faith, a copyright holder must evaluate whether the use at issue qualifies as “fair use” under copyright law


Advertisers beware: it’s not easy being ‘green’ when regulators are watching
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2010

A store in San Francisco recently received a makeover: a new coat of ecrucolored paint, a large green-colored logo and the addition of the term GREEN to its previous store name


Internet music breakthrough: industry groups agree on mechanical royalties for interactive streaming and limited downloads
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • September 24 2008

On Tuesday, September 23, 2008, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the Digital Media Association (DiMA), the National Music Publishers' Association (NMPA) and several songwriters' associations announced the details of a landmark deal on mechanical royalties for interactive music streaming and limited music downloads


Congress gives SoundExchange and webcasters authority to settle royalty rates
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • October 1 2008

On September 30, the U.S. Senate approved the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2008, a bill giving SoundExchange and webcasters authority to finalize an agreement on performance royalty rates


Trademark claims against virtual world strip club denied on 1st Amendment grounds
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2009

A court has ruled that incorporating into a video game a virtual strip club with a similar look and feel to the real thing has artistic relevance and that similarities between the real and virtual strip clubs were not explicitly misleading