We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 28

Street art: the everlasting divide between graffiti art and intellectual property protection
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2015

Does intellectual property law protect unsanctioned graffiti art? With the rising appreciation for street art, this is a question of growing


Court extends publishers’ rights to freelance works to CD-ROMs of back issues, unless
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2008

In a significant victory for publishers in their long-running battle with freelancers, a federal appeals court in Atlanta recently ruled that magazine publishers do not have to compensate the individual copyright holders of freelanced articles and photographs when the magazines are reproduced on CD-ROM for commercial sale, unless contracts between the publisher and the freelancer provide to the contrary


Court says Copyright Royalty Board can legally set webcasters' royalty payments
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2010

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that the Copyright Royalty Board is constitutional


Congress considers new bill seeking performance royalties for performing artists and record labels
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • December 21 2007

On December 18, members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees introduced bipartisan, bicameral legislation to require terrestrial or conventional radio stations to compensate performing artists and their record labels when they broadcast their work


What you don't know about IP protection for social games can hurt you
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2011

Copying within the games industry is prevalent


Court: implementing proper DMCA policy provides website operators ‘safe harbor’ from copyright infringement
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2010

Google has prevailed in the closely watched lawsuit against its YouTube website by Viacom, with the federal district court granting summary judgment in favor of Google


Advertisers beware: it’s not easy being ‘green’ when regulators are watching
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2010

A store in San Francisco recently received a makeover: a new coat of ecrucolored paint, a large green-colored logo and the addition of the term GREEN to its previous store name


10 frequently asked questions about virtual worlds
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2009

Internet techonology is on the cusp of a transformation as significant as the popularization of the World Wide Web in the 1990s


Internet radio royalty dispute reaching endfor now
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 18 2009

The long-running battle over royalties owed by webcasterscompanies that broadcast music over the Internettook several significant leaps towards conclusion last month with important developments both inside and outside of the courtroom


Automated program for playing virtual world game deemed copyright infringement
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 14 2008

In July 2008, a U.S. District Court in Arizona found on summary judgment that the use of an automated program to play a virtual world game constituted copyright infringement