We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,042

Whose House Is It? Universal City Studios LLC v Philip Gorecki 2017 ATMO 18
  • Williams + Hughes
  • Australia
  • April 18 2017

For readers of a certain, mature age, love them or hate them, the National Lampoon movies formed a significant part of the 1980’s movie heritage (dare

Soft Kitty, Same Kitty: The Big Bang Theory sued for copyright infringement Bazinga
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia, USA
  • March 17 2016

Over Christmas, the producers of The Big Bang Theory (amongst others) received a rather unwelcome gift - their now-famous Soft Kitty lullaby has

Federal Court finds Domain lead consumers up the garden path
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • April 10 2017

A recent dispute between fierce digital and media rivals highlights the importance of making accurate claims when advertising and when broad claims

Professional sport is a recreational activity; and there are insurance implications!
  • McInnes Wilson Lawyers
  • Australia
  • April 11 2017

Mr Goode (plaintiff) was riding a horse named “Shot of the Rails” at the Queanbeyan Racecourse on 29 June 2009. Mr Angland (defendant) was riding a

The High Price of Flagrant Conduct
  • Williams + Hughes
  • Australia
  • April 7 2017

Most legal practitioners have the principles of damages drilled into them as law students - damages are compensatory in nature and designed to place

Telecommunications, Media And Technology (TMT) Law Update - Volume 11
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • March 22 2017

Key developments during February 2017 in the area of Technology, Media and Telecommunications (TMT) are summarised as follows. New South Wales Supreme

Pitbull mauls suave promoter
  • Thynne & Macartney
  • Australia
  • November 15 2012

A recent court case saw rapper Armando Christian Perez (aka”Pitbull” ) take on an Aussie promoter and win

Why Dulux was fined $400,000 for making misleading claims that its paints cooled houses by up to 15C
  • Cordato Partners
  • Australia
  • January 16 2017

Dulux has been fined because its regulatory compliance programme failed to prevent false or misleading performance claims from being made for its heat

AOD-9604: patents, peptides, performance and.cellulite?
  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • Australia
  • May 14 2013

Australia is no stranger to sporting scandals. Cricket's "John the bookmaker" affair, horse racing's "Fine Cotton" scandal and any number of player

Qualified privilege can be a defence against defamation actions
  • CBP Lawyers
  • Australia
  • February 25 2013

Where a public attack is made on a party’s reputation or character, the party is entitled to publicly defend itself with comments that may be