We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 89

Australian and Singaporean courts clarify ‘own name’ defence
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia, Singapore
  • August 10 2016

The bona fide use of ‘own name’ is a longstanding defence to trademark infringement in Singapore and Australia. However, although case law on the


Technology, media and telecommunications law update - June 2016
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • July 19 2016

The Federal Court has imposed a penalty of $1.5 million on an Australian sports bet company, and a penalty of $1.25 million on a related UK


Technology, Media and Telecommunications Law Update - May 2016
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • June 6 2016

Key developments during May 2016 in the areas of Technology, Media and Telecommunications are summarised as follows. Penalty for misleading conduct by


Telecommunications, media and technology law update - April 2016
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia, OECD
  • May 10 2016

Key recent developments in the area of Technology, Media and Telecommunications (TMT) law are summarised as follows. Copyright in Russian television


Australian consumer law update: ACCC cases targeting false or misleading representations
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • March 17 2016

Below is an update on three recent Federal Court of Australia cases targeting deceptive advertising and contraventions of the Australian Consumer Law


Court refuses injunction in TV format copyright dispute between Seven's My Kitchen Rules and Nine's The Hotplate
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • August 11 2015

On 31 July 2015, three days after Channel Nine aired the first episode of its new reality cooking show,The Hotplate, Channel Seven issued proceedings


LG’s comparative advertisement with Samsung for 3D TV was misleading
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • April 28 2015

Samsung issued proceedings against LG for misleading or deceptive conduct and the tort of injurious falsehood in relation to six television


Seafolly to pay double damages for false statements made about swimwear competitor
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • October 24 2014

Madden and Seafolly are competitors in the swimwear industry. Madden posted comments on her personal and business Facebook pages, and in emails to


TiVo successfully sets aside Deed of Company Arrangement entered into by Vivo
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • September 12 2014

In a decision handed down on 29 July 2014, Justice Gordon of the Federal Court held that a Deed of Company Arrangement (DOCA) entered into by Vivo


Seafolly’s response to competitor’s misleading and deceptive Facebook posts were also misleading and deceptive
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia, USA
  • July 1 2014

In November 2012, the Federal Court held that comments posted by an individual (Madden) on her personal and business Facebook pages and in emails to