We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 79

ECtHR finds no breach of Article 10 right to freedom of expression where website held liable for users' defamatory comments
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Estonia, European Union
  • November 11 2013

The European Court of Human Rights ("ECtHR") has unanimously held in Delfi AS v Estonia (No. 6456909) that Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the


CJEU rules on scope of protection granted to technological protection measures
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • February 20 2014

The CJEU has ruled on the extent to which Article 6 of the Information Society Directive (200129EC) protects technological protection measures


CJEU issues ruling on internet browsing technology in the Meltwater case
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 5 2014

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) today issued its decision in the Meltwater Case C-36013, a long-running (5 year) dispute between


ECJ rules that the broadcasting of music within private dental practices does not entitle music producers to remuneration
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, Italy
  • May 31 2012

On 15 March 2012, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued a preliminary ruling on the questions referred by the Italian Court of Appeal of Turin in the occasion of a proceeding regarding the obligation of a dentist to pay a remuneration to the phonogram producers for the broadcasting of phonograms in his dental practice by way of background music


Digital media update
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Australia, European Union, United Kingdom
  • January 25 2012

Welcome to the January edition of our quarterly Digital Media Update


High Court ruling in catch up TV case
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • February 29 2012

Further to the original judgment in ITV Broadcasting Limited & others v TV Catchup Limited in July 2011, Justice Floyd has handed down a further judgment to confirm which of the issues highlighted in the July judgment should be referred to the European Court of Justice and the terms of those questions to be referred


Regulatory & public law group annual digest 2012
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's


Broadcasters can prohibit streamed internet retransmission of their broadcasts by the "communication to the public" right
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • March 19 2013

On 7th March the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "CJEU") held in ITV Broadcasting Ltd and others v TV Catchup Ltd1that live streaming


Annual digest 2012
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's Olympic Stadium, the anti-doping movement has come under increased pressure this year