We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 116

Spanish Supreme Court requests the CJEU to provide a preliminary ruling regarding compensation for moral prejudice in cases of intellectual property rights infringement
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, Spain
  • March 30 2015

On 12 January 2015, the Civil Chamber of the Spanish Supreme Court issued an Order (hereinafter, the "Order") presenting a question for preliminary


CJEU issues ruling on internet browsing technology in the Meltwater case
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 5 2014

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) today issued its decision in the Meltwater Case C-36013, a long-running (5 year) dispute between


CJEU rules on scope of protection granted to technological protection measures
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • February 20 2014

The CJEU has ruled on the extent to which Article 6 of the Information Society Directive (200129EC) protects technological protection measures



European pharmaceuticals & healthcare newsletter - April 2015
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, France, Hungary, Italy, United Kingdom
  • April 30 2015

This is a rare example of a major product liability dispute being referred to the European Court of Justice ("ECJ"). The two issues to be decided by


ECtHR finds no breach of Article 10 right to freedom of expression where website held liable for users' defamatory comments
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Estonia, European Union
  • November 11 2013

The European Court of Human Rights ("ECtHR") has unanimously held in Delfi AS v Estonia (No. 6456909) that Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the


Regulatory & public law group annual digest 2012
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's


Broadcasters can prohibit streamed internet retransmission of their broadcasts by the "communication to the public" right
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • March 19 2013

On 7th March the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "CJEU") held in ITV Broadcasting Ltd and others v TV Catchup Ltd1that live streaming


High Court ruling in catch up TV case
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • February 29 2012

Further to the original judgment in ITV Broadcasting Limited & others v TV Catchup Limited in July 2011, Justice Floyd has handed down a further judgment to confirm which of the issues highlighted in the July judgment should be referred to the European Court of Justice and the terms of those questions to be referred


Annual digest 2012
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • December 13 2012

2012 has been an eventful sporting year, and while it may be hyperbole to argue that the drama of the arbitration rooms of Lausanne matched London's Olympic Stadium, the anti-doping movement has come under increased pressure this year