We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 126

CJEU rules on scope of protection granted to technological protection measures
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • February 20 2014

The CJEU has ruled on the extent to which Article 6 of the Information Society Directive (200129EC) protects technological protection measures


OFT publishes finalised principles for online and app-based games
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • February 20 2014

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has published its finalised set of eight principles for online and app-based games. This followed a market


Game over for libel tourism?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

The world's rich and famous have been bringing defamation actions in the High Court in London for years, against newspapers, rivals and social media


End of press freedom or advent of effective regulation?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

While the press regulator, the Press Complaints Commission ("PCC") is still in place for now, its days are numbered. It is widely accepted that the


“If you are not cheating, you are not trying”
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

Integrity, fair play and uncertainty of outcome are fundamental to sport. The thrill is in the highs and lows of watching sporting heroes struggle to


Media operators practical tips for navigating the threat of anonymous posters
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

Tweeting, trending, blogging, posting - year on year, social media networking and information sharing (sometimes, oversharing) become more prominent


Comparative advertising: Sainsbury's Tesco judicial review on misleading comparisons
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • November 11 2013

Sainsbury's reportedly initiated judicial review proceedings on 31 October 2013 in order to challenge the Advertising Standards Authority's


Not in my back yard! - High Court takes a hard line on libel tourism
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • November 11 2013

Two recent High Court decisions suggest the English courts are not prepared to become a go-to forum for claimants challenging defamatory statements


Interflora v Marks & Spencer: High Court rules on keyword advertising: infringement but uncertainties remain
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • August 31 2013

The High Court has delivered its judgment in the long-running Interflora v Marks & Spencer saga


Consultations and inquiries
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • August 19 2013

The consultation seeks views on the ways in which appeals of regulatory and competition decisions might be streamlined and whether the right balance