We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 102

End of press freedom or advent of effective regulation?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

While the press regulator, the Press Complaints Commission ("PCC") is still in place for now, its days are numbered. It is widely accepted that the


“If you are not cheating, you are not trying”
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

Integrity, fair play and uncertainty of outcome are fundamental to sport. The thrill is in the highs and lows of watching sporting heroes struggle to


Media operators practical tips for navigating the threat of anonymous posters
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

Tweeting, trending, blogging, posting - year on year, social media networking and information sharing (sometimes, oversharing) become more prominent


New UK Audiovisual Media Services Regulations come into force
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • January 25 2010

On 19 December 2009, the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2009 came into force in the UK and they implement certain provisions of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive which had not yet been implemented into UK law or in Ofcom's statutory codes


New UK tax relief for video games developers from 1 April 2013
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • January 22 2013

Video games developers will be eligible to obtain an important new UK corporation tax relief for their video game development and production costs in


Comparative advertising: Sainsbury's Tesco judicial review on misleading comparisons
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • November 11 2013

Sainsbury's reportedly initiated judicial review proceedings on 31 October 2013 in order to challenge the Advertising Standards Authority's


Not in my back yard! - High Court takes a hard line on libel tourism
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • November 11 2013

Two recent High Court decisions suggest the English courts are not prepared to become a go-to forum for claimants challenging defamatory statements


CA rules hacking of previously heard voicemails still a "communication in course of transmission"
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • August 6 2013

The Court of Appeal has ruled that hacking into saved voicemail messages after the receipt has already heard them is still an interception of a


CJEU rules on scope of protection granted to technological protection measures
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • February 20 2014

The CJEU has ruled on the extent to which Article 6 of the Information Society Directive (200129EC) protects technological protection measures


Game over for libel tourism?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • December 18 2013

The world's rich and famous have been bringing defamation actions in the High Court in London for years, against newspapers, rivals and social media