We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 93

Supreme Court to Review Registrability of Disparaging Trademarks
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 26 2016

On September 29, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for certiorari to consider the constitutionality of a provision of


Not What the Doctor Ordered: Injunction Ruled Too Narrow in Trademark Infringement Case
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 26 2016

Addressing the scope of injunctive relief awarded in a trademark infringement case, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a


Certification Mark May Be Infringed Despite Nominative Fair Use, Lack of Source Confusion
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 28 2016

Addressing the use of a certification mark in connection with information systems training, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed


Standing Under Lanham Act Premised on Defendant’s Putative Conduct
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed a district court's application of the two-part test for prudential standing to bring a Lanham


Willfulness Remains Prerequisite to Award of Infringer’s Profits
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 28 2016

Addressing whether willfulness is a prerequisite to an award of a trademark infringer's profits, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit


Rosa Parks Name and Likeness Free for Use?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2016

Addressing the balance between privacy rights and matters of public interest, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the


Trying to Outhustle a Permanent Injunction
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2016

Addressing the issue of modifying a permanent injunction for trademark infringement, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that an


Disparagement Proscription of 2(a) Is Unconstitutional
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

In the last several decades, the disparagement provision of 2(a) of the Lanham Act has become a more frequent basis for rejection or Cancellation


Federal Circuit: Disparagement Proscription of 2(a) of the Lanham Act Unconstitutional
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 28 2015

In the last several decades, the disparagement provision of 2(a) of the Lanham Act has become a more frequent basis for rejection or cancellation of


Proof of confusion essential for trademark injunction
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing the likelihood of success requirement for injunctive relief, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated an order requiring