We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 17

The European Union’s highest court rules on standard-essential patents, injunctions and abuse of dominance
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • August 27 2015

The long-awaited ruling regarding the circumstances under which the owner of a standard-essential patent (SEP) encumbered by fair, reasonable and


A new concept in cartel fining: “direct EEA sales through transformed products”
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • July 27 2015

On 9 July 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its judgment in InnoLux Corp. v Commission C-23114P, confirming the


The European Union’s highest court rules on standard-essential patents, injunctions and abuse of dominance
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • July 23 2015

The long-awaited ruling on the seeking of injunctions in the context of standard-essential patents encumbered by fair, reasonable, and


EU court maintains tough stance against business practices by firms with strong market power
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • June 16 2014

On 12 June 2014, the European Union’s Court of First Instance, the General Court, in Intel v European Commission (Case T-28609), condemned a number of


EU court maintains tough stance against business practices by firms with strong market power
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • June 16 2014

On 12 June 2014, the European Union's Court of first instance, the General Court, in Intel v European Commission (Case T-28609), condemned a number


EU’s top court rules that blanket ban on access to leniency documents is not permitted
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • June 12 2013

The European Union's top court rules that a national law which requires the consent of all parties before access to the file is given to third-party


A new front in the patent wars: CJEU asked for guidance on limits to injunctive relief
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, USA
  • April 11 2013

The patent wars between large technology companies continue unabated. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is set to provide guidance on


ECJ rules access to documents can be denied on basis of general presumption that disclosure undermines merger control proceedings
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • July 3 2012

There is a general presumption that the grant of public access to documents relating to merger control proceedings would undermine the purpose of those proceedings


EU General Court rules European Commission wrong to reject summarily claimants’ requests for access to investigation files
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • May 31 2012

In its latest judgment on the issue of access to antitrust investigation files by third party claimants (EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg v Commission 2012 T-344), the EU General Court has reminded the European Commission that it may not reject summarily private claimants’ requests for access


Disclosure of EU leniency materials: English High Court outlines the boundaries of document disclosure
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • April 23 2012

In the latest of a series of disputes over disclosure in antitrust damages actions, on 4 April 2012 the English High Court ordered that several passages from the confidential version of the European Commission’s decision in COMPF38.899 Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) and associated materials submitted to the Commission by companies seeking lenient treatment (leniency materials) be turned over to UK National Grid plc, in support of its damages claim against certain suppliers of GIS