We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 237

When can third parties get you 'on the hook' for cartel fines?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • August 4 2016

In VM Remonts the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled for the first time on whether a company can be liable for competition law infringements that


ECJ: when can a third party can get you on the hook for a cartel fine?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • August 2 2016

In VM Remonts (link here), the EU Court of Justice (“ECJ”) ruled for the first time on whether a company can be liable for competition law


ECJ: When Can a Third Party Can Get You on the Hook for a Cartel Fine?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • July 27 2016

In VM Remonts, the EU Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled for the first time on whether a company can be liable for competition law


Leading decision of the Swiss Supreme Court on by-object restrictions under Swiss competition law
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, Switzerland
  • July 22 2016

On 28 June 2016, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (the “Court“) rendered a leading decision regarding the significance of anti-competitive agreements


Wait?! What?! An admin message from an e-commerce platform means I've just fixed prices?
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union, Lithuania
  • July 21 2016

E-Turas offers its travel tour reservation system to 30 travel agents in Lithuania. Travel agents integrated the E-Turas system into their websites


The CAT's Fast-Track Procedure: Recent Developments in its Application
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • United Kingdom
  • July 11 2016

For the first time, the Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") has applied the rules governing applications for the Fast Track Procedure ("FTP"


Droit de la concurrence : un pas en avant deux pas en arriere
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • European Union
  • July 11 2016

Si la Cour de justice de l'Union europeenne (CJUE) a trouve le juste Milieu, cher a Aristote, dans ses arrets du 10 mars 2016 relatifs a la


Criminal offences against the market and compliance guidelines in Spain
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Spain
  • July 5 2016

In light of the severity of recent sanctions imposed under administrative law and criminal law to anti-competitive practices, and the possibility of


Leading decision of the Swiss Supreme Court on by-object restrictions under Swiss competition law
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Switzerland
  • June 30 2016

On 28 June 2016, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (the "Court") rendered a leading decision regarding the significance of anti-competitive agreements


Brexit - Implications for Australian businesses
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Australia, European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 28 2016

On 23 June 2016, a referendum was passed in the UK for the UK to "Brexit" or exit from the European Union (EU). This will have significant