We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 92

Ninth Circuit affirms divestiture of consummated physician practice acquisition
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 27 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed an Idaho federal district court’s decision ordering the divestiture of a physician practice


Contractual duty to deal does not equal antitrust duty to deal
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

Addressing for the first time whether a patent holder under a contractual duty to deal is also subject to an antitrust duty to deal, the U. S. Court


FTC takes a broad, "generic" approach to Actavis in Amicus brief
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 22 2013

The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) battle against "reverse-payment" settlements continues. In an amicus brief recently submitted in the case of In


Focus on regulatory law - July 2014
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • France
  • July 16 2014

Having been notified of an appeal against the Competition Authority’s decision regarding a joint acquisition of retail trade warehouses, the Conseil


Focus on regulatory law - October 2014
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • France
  • October 3 2014

The applicant claimed that the provisions of I, Article L. 430-8 of the French Commercial Code, which allows the Competition Authority to fine


North Carolina Dental Board urges reversal of FTC’s “radical” stance on state action immunity
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 5 2014

North Carolina's State Board of Dental Examiners has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to reject the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's) "radical


Second Circuit to hear expedited appeal in “product hopping” suit
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

On January 6, 2015, the Second Circuit granted defendants’ motion for an expedited appeal but denied their motion for a stay in New York v


Supreme Court limits availability of state action immunity from federal antitrust liability
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 20 2013

The Supreme Court decision in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., makes clear that state action immunity from federal antitrust laws is


Supreme Court hears oral argument in pay-for-delay patent settlement antitrust case
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 26 2013

The Supreme Court's ruling in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., will almost certainly have major implications for the viability of Federal


North Carolina dentists seek rehearing en banc after losing bid for antitrust immunity
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 19 2013

North Carolina's dentists were not smiling when a three judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit sided with the Federal Trade