We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 27

Delaware Court of Chancery rejects contemporaneous ownership requirement for creditors asserting derivative claims
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

In Quadrant Structured Products Co. v. Vertin, C.A. No. 6990-VCL, 2014 Del. Ch. LEXIS 193 (Del. Ch. Oct. 1, 2014), the Delaware Court of Chancery


Expanded protections for directors navigating the zone of insolvency
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • October 25 2007

In 1991, a decision of the Delaware Chancery Court helped popularize the term "zone of insolvency.”


Dead zone? Direct claims by creditors of a California corporation may not lie against management based on management's allegedly shifting duties when corporation is in the zone of insolvency or even insolvent
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2010

The California Court of Appeal recently rejected the argument that directors and officers owe fiduciary duties to the company's creditors when the company is in the so-called "zone of insolvency," or is even clearly insolvent


California Court of Appeal clarifies fiduciary duties when a company is insolvent or nearing insolvency
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • January 8 2010

Directors of California corporations have, for years, struggled to understand the scope of their fiduciary duties when a corporation is insolvent versus when a corporation is in the "zone of insolvency."


Justice Friedman allows breach of fiduciary duty claim to proceed against corporate directors under Delaware Law
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • September 16 2015

In AP Services, LLP v. Lobell et. Al, No. 6516132012, 2015 NY Slip Op 31115(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. June 19, 2015) (argued Feb. 21, 2014), Justice


California Supreme Court resolves Court of Appeal split, holding that Section 2010 of the California Corporations Code -- California's "Survival Statute" -- does not apply to foreign corporations
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2013

In Greb v. Diamond Int'l Corp., 2013 WL 628328 (Cal. Feb. 21, 2013), the California Supreme Court unequivocally and unanimously laid to rest the


Supreme Court Holds That “Actual Fraud” Under Section 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code May Include Fraudulent Transfers That Occur Without False Representations
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2016

On May 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court in Husky International Electronics v. Ritz held that the phrase “actual fraud” under section


Robert Sahyan
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Daniel L. Brown
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Sarah E. Aberg
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP