We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 70

Hojjatian v. Intact Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • June 21 2016

Water damage caused by water seeping through the foundational walls of an insured's property was outside the scope of the insured's "water escape"


Plotkine v Seidenfeld
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 22 2014

The Applicant (Mr. Plotkine) unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal a decision of the Ontario Municipal Board. The Board had permitted 10 variances for


224981 Ontario Inc. v. Intact Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 19 2016

Insurer was obligated to pay a loss of rental income claim under a property insurance policy following a fire because the tenant was under no


Saskatchewan court finds brokerage did not make clear to policyholder an exclusion for vandalism based on vacancy
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 21 2011

The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench recently found that a brokerage had breached its duty of care by not informing a client about a policy coverage exclusion for vandalism that applied immediately upon his rental property being vacated


Snow v. Royal Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2016

The appeal of a motion judge's decision determining that remediation of the contaminated land underneath the respondent's home was covered under the


Monk v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co. (Lindsay)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 16 2016

The exception for resulting damage was read in to the exclusion clause for "the cost of faulty workmanship" where the exclusion clause was silent on


Mississippi River Power Corp. v. Municipal Electric Assn. Reciprocal Insurance Exchange
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 15 2014

Reasonable preventative measures taken by an insured to prevent probable future damages may not be recoverable where the policy excludes coverage for


Friedmann v. Macgarvie
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • October 12 2011

The Court set aside and remitted back to a re-hearing the decision of British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal which had found that sexual harassment constituted discrimination based on sex


Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause


Webber v. Anmore (Village) (Approving Officer)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 30 2012

The appellants appealed from a judicial review decision where the substantive relief sought in their petition was no longer available