We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 72

Plotkine v Seidenfeld
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 22 2014

The Applicant (Mr. Plotkine) unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal a decision of the Ontario Municipal Board. The Board had permitted 10 variances for


Glaspell v. Ontario (Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 28 2015

The plaintiff homeowner (Mr. Glaspell) took issue with his neighbour's construction of a dock and boathouse on Big Cedar Lake. Mr. Glaspell commenced


Tedford v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2012

Although the insurer was found to owe a duty to defend to its insureds, because most of the claims would not be covered the court ordered an apportionment of defence costs


Zheng v. John Galon Insurance Services Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • August 23 2016

Where an insurance application specifically asks whether an insured property will have renters or tenants, and the insured answers 'no,' an insured


Monk v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Co. (Lindsay)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • February 16 2016

The exception for resulting damage was read in to the exclusion clause for "the cost of faulty workmanship" where the exclusion clause was silent on


Hojjatian v. Intact Insurance Co
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • June 21 2016

Water damage caused by water seeping through the foundational walls of an insured's property was outside the scope of the insured's "water escape"


Chong v. Wan
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 30 2014

The applicant landlord unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal a decision of the Residential Tenancies Commission which required him to pay


Newbigging v. M. Butler Insurance Brokers Ltd
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • November 23 2012

No coverage for an insured whose property was vandalized while it was vacant due to a vacancy clause


Municipal Planning Commission - Beaverford v. Thorhild (County No. 7)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 22 2012

A municipal councillor who previously expressed a definitive opinion on the topic of appeal ought to have been recused from hearing the appeal


Saskatchewan court finds brokerage did not make clear to policyholder an exclusion for vandalism based on vacancy
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 21 2011

The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench recently found that a brokerage had breached its duty of care by not informing a client about a policy coverage exclusion for vandalism that applied immediately upon his rental property being vacated