We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 56

Alberta Residential Corp. v. Certain Lloyd's Underwriters Subscribing to Authority Agreement No. YF091589
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 21 2015

Condominum policy insuring against damage to common property and units within the building covers water damage necessitating repairs to interior


Plotkine v Seidenfeld
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 22 2014

The Applicant (Mr. Plotkine) unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal a decision of the Ontario Municipal Board. The Board had permitted 10 variances for


Eagle's Nest Youth Ranch Inc. v. Corman Park (Rural Municipality, No. 344)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 26 2013

The applicant, Eagle’s Nest Youth Ranch Inc., applied to the respondent, Rural Municipality of Corman Park No. 344, for discretionary use approval of


Jomaa v. Jomaa
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • January 16 2012

An application seeking a declaration that the defendant was an unnamed insured under the policy was dismissed when it was shown that the defendant, who was a relative of the insureds, maintained a separate and distinct household from the insureds


Cheecham v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • December 30 2010

The insured owned a single family rental property


Property disclosure statements - what home purchasers should know
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • May 10 2011

Excited about their first home purchase, Mike and Sarah Tan carefully reviewed the contract documents and property disclosure statement ("PDS") for a small bungalow in a quiet neighbourhood


Glaspell v. Ontario (Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing)
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 28 2015

The plaintiff homeowner (Mr. Glaspell) took issue with his neighbour's construction of a dock and boathouse on Big Cedar Lake. Mr. Glaspell commenced


Mississippi River Power Corp. v. Municipal Electric Assn. Reciprocal Insurance Exchange
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • September 15 2014

Reasonable preventative measures taken by an insured to prevent probable future damages may not be recoverable where the policy excludes coverage for


Merei v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • July 25 2014

The insureds' homeowners policy had standard terms and was effective on February 25, 2006. The declarations page included the following statement


Stewart v. TD General Insurance Co.
  • Harper Grey LLP
  • Canada
  • April 25 2013

An action for coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy to recover the full value of legally cultivated marijuana plants was dismissed. Coverage