We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 265

Snackbar halts multinational
  • Chiever
  • Netherlands, European Union
  • June 22 2017

Never have so many American fast food chains touched down in the Netherlands as in 2017. Dunkin’ Donuts, Pizzahut, Taco Bell, Five Guys and TGI Friday

Propriété intellectuelle : Droit d'information
  • Hogan Lovells
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • April 4 2017

Le droit d’information peut être mis en œuvre dans une procédure autonome initiée après une première action ayant abouti à la constatation d’une

The Netherlands: conceptual similarities play decisive and highly important role in opposition proceedings
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • March 30 2017

The Dutch company “Levola” is known for its cream cheese sold as “Heksenkaas” (“Witches’ Cheese”). Heksenkaas is a spreadable dip made of cream

“Bull fight” finally yields a victor
  • NLO
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • March 28 2017

After fourteen years, the protracted legal fight between coffee shop The Bulldog and energy drink brand Red Bull is over. Representing

Het complete verhaal: “Bull fight” levert eindelijk winnaar op
  • NLO
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • March 23 2017

Na veertien jaar is er een einde gekomen aan de juridische slijtageslag tussen coffeeshop The Bulldog en energydrinkmerk Red Bull. Milca

Porsche versus PRSCHE
  • Taylor Wessing
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • November 29 2016

On 26 October 2016 the District Court in The Hague (the Netherlands) rendered a decision in a case brought by the German company Dr. Ing. H.C.F

Handelspraktijken en consumentenrecht - Selectie van hangende prejudiciële vragen bij het Hof van justitie
  • Stibbe
  • Belgium, European Union, Netherlands
  • April 28 2016

Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing ingediend door de Cour d’appel de Paris (Frankrijk) op 4 November 2015 - Carrefour Hypermarchés SAS ITM

Court of Appeal - The Hague: confusing similarity between the device mark of Lacoste and the word mark EAU CROCO
  • NautaDutilh
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • February 25 2016

In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal of The Hague concluded that there is a confusing similarity between Lacoste's device mark consisting of a

Assessing the real risk of market partitioning and the burden of proof
  • AKD
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • February 15 2016

A rights holder can control the initial marketing in the European Economic Area (EEA) of goods bearing its trademark. Consequently, it can prohibit

Decision shows importance of considering possible existence of specialised sub-group among relevant public
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • January 26 2016

In Research Engineering & Manufacturing Inc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) (Case T-55814), the General Court has dismissed