We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,685

After Several Unsuccessful Attempts by Apple, an Injunction Will Soon Prohibit Samsung from Infringing Apple Patents
  • Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2016

Years after Apple started a long-running patent battle against Samsung, an injunction will become


Digital Models: ITC and align ask for Federal Circuit en banc review
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • February 3 2016

On January 27, 2016, both the International Trade Commission (ITC or “Commission”) and Align Technology, Inc. (“Align”) petitioned the Federal


ClearCorrect: ITC and Patentee Align Submit Petitions for Rehearing En Banc, Asking Federal Circuit to Reconsider Whether the ITC Has Jurisdiction Over Digital Imports
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

On January 27, 2016, the International Trade Commission (ITC) formally requested a rehearing en banc of a November 10, 2015, Federal Circuit panel


Post-Grant PTAB Procedures Are Constitutional
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

In a case of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the constitutionality of inter partes review (IPR


C.F. Stinson, Inc. et al v. Douglass Industries, Inc.
  • Dickinson Wright PLLC
  • USA
  • January 28 2016

C.F. Stinson, Inc. and Sample Technologies, LLC filed suit against Douglass Industries, Inc. for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,249,035


Summary judgment of noninfringement is recommended
  • Morris James LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2016

Thynge, C.M. J. Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement be granted and that its motion


Apple (Finally) Enjoins the Sale of (Obsolete) Samsung Phones
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 21 2016

In the latest development in the patent skirmishes between Apple and Samsung, on Monday, January 18, 2016, U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh of the


Once Again, the Purpose of the Invention Determines Patent-Eligibility
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2016

In ruling on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Northern District of Ohio recently determined that a patent for searching and unifying data


Claims are construed in computer technology case
  • Morris James LLP
  • USA
  • January 15 2016

Stark, C.J. Claim construction opinion issues regarding nineteen terms from seven patents. A Markman hearing took place on November 17, 2015 The


Claim is construed in electronics case
  • Morris James LLP
  • USA
  • January 7 2016

Sleet, J. Claim construction opinion issues regarding twenty three terms from three patents. The disputed technology relates to laser technology. The