We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 2,035

비자명성(Non-Obviousness)에 의한 거절이유가 2 부족할 때
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • South Korea, USA
  • October 4 2016

미국 특허법에서 35 U.S.C. 103은 특허를 받는 기술이 종래의 기술에 비추어 보았을 때 해당 분야의 통상의 기술을 가진 자에게 자명(obvious)하지 않을 것을 요구합니다. 이것은 세상에 이미 알려진 바와 비교했을 때 너무 “뻔한” 기술한테는 특허라는


On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related


Apple v. Samsung Electronics: the perils of email auto deletion
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2012

Apple recently received an e-discovery victory in their global patent battle with Samsung Electronics


AIPPI Standing Committee Report
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • September 14 2016

A report by the AIPPI Standing Committee on information technology and Internet on the current situation around the world on the protection of


IPR Panel Denies Motion to Amend Based on 35 U.S.C. 101
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • March 30 2016

Amazon.com, Inc. v. Personalized Media Communications, LLC, IPR2014-01530, Final Written Decision, Paper 55 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 24, 2016). In


Asia Chronicle: Issue 3 - JanuaryFebruary 2016
  • Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC
  • British Virgin Islands, China, Japan, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • March 1 2016

The Privy Council has unanimously held that an arbitration clause stating that ‘any party may submit the dispute to binding arbitration’ amounts to


A flexible approach to law making
  • CCPIT Patent & Trademark Law Office
  • China
  • March 8 2017

Since the Chinese intellectual property laws provide only the framework of the country’s IP systems, the Supreme Court has issued many judicial


Function Media, LLC v. Google Inc., No. 2012-1020 (Fed. Cir. Feb 13, 2013)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • February 28 2013

Special purpose computer-implemented means-plus-function limitations require the specification to disclose the algorithm for performing the function


Les brevets en matière informatique : nouvelles balises
  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • Canada
  • December 12 2014

Il est fréquent que des entreprises mettent au point et tentent de protéger des éléments de propriété intellectuelle relatifs à des méthodes


Will the public suffer? Let’s stay!
  • Carpmaels & Ransford LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • December 17 2014

The recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications Plc shows that the UK courts are