We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,916

PTAB continues to evolve its covered business method patent jurisprudence
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 30 2015

In two related decisions, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that patents directed to a personal computer interactive


Online transaction claim held unpatentable
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

In BUYSAFE, Inc. V. Google, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1575, the Federal Circuit affirmed a judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. 101 for lack of


News and cases from China: August - September 2015
  • Rouse
  • China
  • October 29 2015

Recently, the National Copyright Administration issued Implementing Measures for the Copyright Administrative Penalties (Revision Draft for Comment


PTAB grants request for rehearing relating to procedure for serving petitions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

In an order granting a request for rehearing to address the issue of a filing date of a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and


“Upselling” patent case against Amazon dismissed
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On March 25, 2015, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a patent infringement case against Amazon.com Inc., saying that the patent at issue covered


Apple ordered to pay $533m in iTunes patent infringement case
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • March 19 2015

A federal jury in Texas found that Apple's iTunes infringed three patents held by Smartflash LLC and awarded Smartflash over half a billion dollars


“Abstract idea” expands, now includes back-and-forth browser functionality
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

In Internet Patents v. Active Network, No. 14-1048 (Fed. Cir. June 23, 2015), the Federal Circuit affirmed yet another invalidity ruling for lack of


Online banking patents based on “abstract ideas” held patent ineligible under Alice
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA), NA, Appeal No. 2014-1506, the Federal Circuit held that claims directed to (a) storing and


Nothing non-obvious about applying pre-existing technology to the Internet
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 28 2013

Addressing the issue of obviousness of patents directed to Internet-based software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a


Barry v. Medtronic: District Court Orders Strict Limits on Social Media Contacts with Potential Jurors
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 1 2016

As the patent infringement case between Mark Barry, M.D. ("Barry") and Medtronic approached trial, the district court informed the parties that it