We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,965

PTAB continues to evolve its covered business method patent jurisprudence
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 30 2015

In two related decisions, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that patents directed to a personal computer interactive

비자명성(Non-Obviousness)에 의한 거절이유가 2 부족할 때
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • South Korea, USA
  • October 4 2016

미국 특허법에서 35 U.S.C. 103은 특허를 받는 기술이 종래의 기술에 비추어 보았을 때 해당 분야의 통상의 기술을 가진 자에게 자명(obvious)하지 않을 것을 요구합니다. 이것은 세상에 이미 알려진 바와 비교했을 때 너무 “뻔한” 기술한테는 특허라는

The Federal Circuit Muddies The 101 Waters After BASCOM
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • November 11 2016

On September 30, 2016, in Intellectual Ventures I LLC, v. Symantec Corp., No. 15-1769, 15-1770, 15-1771, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement

Federal Circuit Expanding Interpretation of Step Two of the Test for Patent Eligibility
  • White & Case LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2016

The Federal Circuit recently reversed a district court's decision granting a motion to dismiss a patent under 35 U.S.C. 101 in Bascom Global

Motion tracking patent invalidated in litigation involving F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

Last week, the Court of Federal Claims invalidated a patent that was asserted against the U.S. Government in a lawsuit regarding the F-35 Joint

eBay ended presumption of irreparable harm in determining the appropriateness of injunctive relief, but the fundamental nature of patents as property rights may not be ignored
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • November 30 2011

In Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp., No. 11-1096 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2011), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s denial of a motion for entry of a permanent injunction and remanded for entry of an appropriate injunction

ESPN loses affirmative defenses and invalidity counterclaim on motion to dismiss but court recognizes unfairness in allowing "bare-bones" infringement complaint while prohibiting defendants from pleading affirmative defenses with brevity
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2012

PageMelding filed a patent infringement action against ESPN asserting a patent that enables internet service and content providers to form mutually beneficial collaborations where website content is customized in accordance with those collaborations

Lottery and Gaming Patents Survive Invalidity Challenge By Claiming Location Feature
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • November 8 2016

In CG Technology Development, LLC, et al. v. BWIN.Party, Inc. et al., (Case No. 2:16-cv-00871-RCJ-VCF, D. Nev. 2016), the patents-in-suit relate to

AIPPI Standing Committee Report
  • Davies Collison Cave
  • Australia
  • September 14 2016

A report by the AIPPI Standing Committee on information technology and Internet on the current situation around the world on the protection of