We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,692

Federal Circuit affirms invalidity under section 101 of patent claims directed to guaranteeing performance of online transactions
  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • September 3 2014

A claim that merely requires generic computer implementation of an abstract idea is not subject matter eligible under section 101. At issue were

Amazon 1-click decision: Canadian Federal Court unequivocally rejects ‘form and substance’ approach in determination of patentable subject-matter
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • October 15 2010

In a strongly-worded and highly anticipated decision, the Federal Court has redefined patentable subject matter in Canada

WiFi "sniffing" ruled not a violation of the Wiretap Act where patent holder sought to collect information that was available over public WiFi networks
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 7 2012

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC ("Innovatio") filed patent infringement actions against various hotels, coffee shops, restaurants and supermarkets for the use of wireless Internet technology located throughout the United States

Amazon Not Liable for Patent Infringement When Other Companies Sell Infringing Products on Amazon's Website
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2015

A Washington court recently held that Amazon was not liable for patent infringement when other companies sold infringing goods on Amazon's website

News and cases from China: August - September 2015
  • Rouse
  • China
  • October 29 2015

Recently, the National Copyright Administration issued Implementing Measures for the Copyright Administrative Penalties (Revision Draft for Comment

Eastern District of Texas Finds Website Labeling Patent Invalid Under 101
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • May 10 2016

Nearly one third of all patent cases filed in the United States are heard by a single judge - J. Rodney Gilstrap of the Eastern District of Texas

The Federal Circuit limits the use of the patent exhaustion defense to "authorized acquirers"
  • Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • USA
  • March 13 2015

On February 10, 2015, the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit in Helferich Patent Licensing v. NY Times and JCPenneyreversed a district court

Google’s strategic purchase of rights and counterclaim do not survive Delaware’s statute of limitations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 30 2015

Addressing the requirements for tolling the statute of limitations (SOL), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district

$368 million damages award vacated
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

In VIRNETX, Inc. V. Cisco SYSTEMS, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1489, the Federal Circuit vacated a damages award for use of an improper royalty base

Online transaction claim held unpatentable
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

In BUYSAFE, Inc. V. Google, Inc., Appeal No. 2013-1575, the Federal Circuit affirmed a judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. 101 for lack of