We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,749

IPR Panel Denies Motion to Amend Based on 35 U.S.C. 101
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • March 30 2016

Amazon.com, Inc. v. Personalized Media Communications, LLC, IPR2014-01530, Final Written Decision, Paper 55 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 24, 2016). In

Motion tracking patent invalidated in litigation involving F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2015

Last week, the Court of Federal Claims invalidated a patent that was asserted against the U.S. Government in a lawsuit regarding the F-35 Joint

“Upselling” patent case against Amazon dismissed
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On March 25, 2015, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a patent infringement case against Amazon.com Inc., saying that the patent at issue covered

Alice one year later litigation trends in districts courts and the PTAB
  • Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • USA
  • June 10 2015

Almost one year ago, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. CLS Bank, a decision that fundamentally changed the way software claims are

Emerging trends: competing policy issues at stake in the Supreme Court’s review of Akamai v. Limelight
  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2014

On April 30, the Supreme Court of the United States reviewed the Federal Circuit's decision in Akamai Technologies, Inc v. Limelight Networks, Inc

Leveling the playing field: Amazon.com, Facebook, Microsoft, and others back Netflix, Inc.’s bid for consideration of "exceptional" Patent Case Standard Under 35 U.S.C. 285
  • Williams Mullen
  • USA
  • September 28 2010

A number of retailers and technology giants including Amazon.com, Facebook, and Microsoft have filed amicus briefs with the Federal Circuit in support of Netflix, Inc.’s petition for rehearing en banc in Media Queue, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. et al. Netflix successfully parried Media Queue’s patent infringement charges in California district court, but was denied attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. 256, because the court concluded that the case failed to qualify as "exceptional" under the statute

Surely business methods are prohibited in Canada? Ramifications of the Amazon appeal decision on doing business (methods) in Canada
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • December 9 2011

A typical business method patent contains claims to innovative, computer-implemented technology related to the practice, administration, or management of an enterprise, usually involving the processing of data specific to enterprise operations

Amazon.com’s one-click patent application allowed in Canada
  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • January 4 2012

Following the Federal Court of Appeal decision reported in our November 2011 Blakes Bulletin, in which the Amazon.com application was remanded to the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) for further consideration, we have now heard that the application has been allowed and a patent will issue with method and apparatus claims

Federal Court of Appeal weighs in on business methods
  • Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
  • Canada
  • November 25 2011

On November 24, 2011, the Federal Court of Appeal released its highly anticipated decision in the case of Amazon.com’s so called ‘one-click’ patent

Judge sanctions Samsung for “auto-delete” of relevant emails when litigation was “reasonably foreseeable”
  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • USA
  • September 25 2012

In one of the rulings from the recent patent mega-trial between tech giants Apple and Samsung regarding smartphones and tablet computers, the Court (Judge Grewal) granted a request from Apple for an adverse inference instruction that Samsung had “failed to preserve evidence” and that the evidence destroyed could be presumed to be favorable to Apple