We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,817

Design Patents - Could a “Real” Design Solve a “Virtual” Problem? Protecting Innovative Design Against Physical or Online Infringing Products
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2016

Want to buy a Porsche 911 for only $159? Well, now you can. Or at least you can buy the virtual 3-D model of a Porsche 911 to 3-D print or to use in


Apple v. Samsung Electronics: the perils of email auto deletion
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2012

Apple recently received an e-discovery victory in their global patent battle with Samsung Electronics


CAFC rules on patent exhaustion
  • Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

The patents-in-suit are directed to sending text messages with a link to a website, and a user can click on the link to retrieve content from the


ESPN loses affirmative defenses and invalidity counterclaim on motion to dismiss but court recognizes unfairness in allowing "bare-bones" infringement complaint while prohibiting defendants from pleading affirmative defenses with brevity
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2012

PageMelding filed a patent infringement action against ESPN asserting a patent that enables internet service and content providers to form mutually beneficial collaborations where website content is customized in accordance with those collaborations


Software and Business Method Inventions After Alice
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • September 23 2016

Patent attorneys are often asked the question: “Is my idea patentable?” Often the idea is related to software or business methods. Well-known business


Bascom v. AT&T Mobility: Fodder for arguments on patent eligibility
  • Frost Brown Todd LLC
  • USA
  • July 5 2016

Last week, in the case of Bascom Global Internet Services v. AT&T Mobility LLC, the Federal Circuit handed down an opinion reversing a decision by


Unambiguous Plain Meaning of Claim Limitations Trumps Other Descriptions in Specification
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • December 21 2015

In Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Sipnet EU S.R.O., Appeal No. 2015-1212, the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB's construction of a claim term in an


Decision instituting CBM and granting motion for joinder CBM2015-00087
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • September 3 2015

In asserting a ground based on obviousness, the petitioner must show where each and every limitation of a claim is disclosed in the prior art and


Federal Circuit Expanding Interpretation of Step Two of the Test for Patent Eligibility
  • White & Case LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2016

The Federal Circuit recently reversed a district court's decision granting a motion to dismiss a patent under 35 U.S.C. 101 in Bascom Global


BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp. (decided June 27, 2016)
  • Workman Nydegger
  • USA
  • July 28 2016

BASCOM sued AT&T for infringement of BASCOM’s U.S. Patent No. 5,987,606. The case was dismissed by the District Court on the grounds that the claims