We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,683

Beyond borders: the power to block the international flow of digital files
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • November 3 2014

With the advance of digital technology, courts are being forced to deal with the legal ramifications beyond the borders of the United States. In a


“Upselling” patent case against Amazon dismissed
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On March 25, 2015, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a patent infringement case against Amazon.com Inc., saying that the patent at issue covered


PTAB grants request for rehearing relating to procedure for serving petitions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

In an order granting a request for rehearing to address the issue of a filing date of a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and


Appeal against exclusion from patentability of software to protect minors online allowed
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • United Kingdom
  • January 12 2012

In relation to the application by Protecting Kids the World Over (PKTWO) 2011 EWHC 2720 (Pat), the High Court of England and Wales has allowed an appeal against a decision of a Hearing Officer that found that an alarm notification system for monitoring inappropriate electronic communications fell within the computer program exclusion


Induced infringement: Federal Circuit joint AkamaiMckesson decision changes the law
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • June 5 2013

For years, courts have struggled with the concept of induced infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(b) states that "whoever actively induces infringement


Newsgroup post held to be a printed publication and anticipatory prior art
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • May 30 2014

On May 27, 2014, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision granting summary judgment of invalidity by the Eastern District of Virginia holding that a


Norwich orders Quebec courts unmask “anonymous” online offenders
  • Langlois Lawyers LLP
  • Canada
  • October 8 2015

In Fers et métaux américains v. Pollard, the Quebec Court of Appeal recognized that Norwich orders are indeed within the jurisdiction of Quebec


ITC Lacks Jurisdiction over Internet Transmissions into United States
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • December 21 2015

In ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. International Trade Commission, Appeal No. 2014-1527, the Federal Circuit held that the ITC could not block the


Final Written Decision Finding All Claims Unpatentable Subject Matter CBM2014-00171
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • February 24 2016

In its Final Written Decision, the Board determined that all of the challenged claims of the ’740 Patent are unpatentable, and denied Patent Owner’s


Online banking patents based on “abstract ideas” held patent ineligible under Alice
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

In Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA), NA, Appeal No. 2014-1506, the Federal Circuit held that claims directed to (a) storing and