We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,416

Chief Judge Kozinski rules in favor of Google finding Street View did not infringe Vederi's patents
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2012

Vederi owns several patents which cover certain methods for enabling users to navigate a geographic area visually from a device, including a personal computer

ESPN loses affirmative defenses and invalidity counterclaim on motion to dismiss but court recognizes unfairness in allowing "bare-bones" infringement complaint while prohibiting defendants from pleading affirmative defenses with brevity
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2012

PageMelding filed a patent infringement action against ESPN asserting a patent that enables internet service and content providers to form mutually beneficial collaborations where website content is customized in accordance with those collaborations

IP snapshot
  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • United Kingdom
  • September 21 2012

The High Court has refused to grant a stay of proceedings for infringement of a Community Trade Mark under Article 104(1) of the CTM Regulation where there were parallel proceedings before OHIM

Judge sanctions Samsung for “auto-delete” of relevant emails when litigation was “reasonably foreseeable”
  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • USA
  • September 25 2012

In one of the rulings from the recent patent mega-trial between tech giants Apple and Samsung regarding smartphones and tablet computers, the Court (Judge Grewal) granted a request from Apple for an adverse inference instruction that Samsung had “failed to preserve evidence” and that the evidence destroyed could be presumed to be favorable to Apple

Soverain Software v. J.C. Penney: denying summary judgment of non-infringement of e-commerce patent based on divided infringement theory
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2012

Plaintiff Soverain Software alleged infringement of patents relating to e-commerce transactions over the Internet involving the use of a shopping cart and online statements

Federal Circuit issues ruling on induced infringement issues
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2012

In a long-awaited ruling, the full Federal Circuit decided the consolidated cases in Akamai Techs., Inc. v. MIT, No. 2009-1372 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2012) and McKesson Techs., Inc. v. Epic Systems Corp., No. 2010-1291 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2012

Judge Stark grants British Telecommunication's motion to amend complaint to add new alleged infringement claims against Google
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • September 29 2012

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P

U.S. Supreme Court orders Federal Circuit to reconsider online advertising patent decision
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • July 20 2012

In several recent cases involving subject matter as diverse as genes, medical diagnosis, and online advertising, the U.S. Supreme Court appears to be trying to narrow the boundaries of patent-eligible subject matter defined by the Federal Circuit

Apple v. Samsung Electronics: the perils of email auto deletion
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2012

Apple recently received an e-discovery victory in their global patent battle with Samsung Electronics

Federal Court says business methods are not excluded from patentability
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • November 25 2010

In a strongly worded decision, the Federal Court of Canada has quashed the Commissioner of Patents’ refusal of the Canadian patent application for Amazon.com’s “1-Click” patent application