We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 11-20 of 1,580

China newsletter - summer 2013
  • Greenberg Traurig LLP
  • China, Macau
  • July 17 2013

For the purpose of fully implementing the spirit of the Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China and attracting more foreign

PTAB grants request for rehearing relating to procedure for serving petitions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

In an order granting a request for rehearing to address the issue of a filing date of a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and

Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Eligible for CBM Review and Unpatentable Under Section 101 CBM2014-00156
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • January 8 2016

In its Final Written Decision, the Board determined that claims 1-4 of the ‘100 patent were unpatentable for claiming ineligible subject matter under

Reverse auction claims found ineligible for patent protection CBM2014-00119
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • USA
  • October 23 2015

Claims involving a conventional system interface, routine data gathering, and routine calculations will likely be found patent ineligible under 101

The anti-social network: Yahoo v. Facebook
  • Coats & Bennett PLLC
  • USA
  • March 21 2012

In quite an anti-social move, Yahoo has sued its former business partner Facebook for patent infringement

Google & Traffic Information rehash claim construction arguments
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2011

After a full round of briefing and oral argument, Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a report and recommendation regarding claim construction, as reported here

Apple v. Samsung Electronics: the perils of email auto deletion
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2012

Apple recently received an e-discovery victory in their global patent battle with Samsung Electronics

WiFi "sniffing" ruled not a violation of the Wiretap Act where patent holder sought to collect information that was available over public WiFi networks
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 7 2012

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC ("Innovatio") filed patent infringement actions against various hotels, coffee shops, restaurants and supermarkets for the use of wireless Internet technology located throughout the United States

Summary judgment on indefiniteness denied where claims reciting term of "engine for" was not a means-plus-function term
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 6 2011

Defendant contended that several claims of a patent were indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112, 2

CIPO allows Amazon.com 1-click patent
  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • Canada
  • January 5 2012

On December 23, 2011, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) issued a Notice of Allowance for Amazon.com’s Canadian Patent Application No. 2,246,933 (filed September 1998) the “1-Click” online purchasing process while leaving some uncertainty as to how business method patents will be handled both by CIPO and the courts going forward