We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 435

Standard-Essential Patents and Pooling - March 2016 - April 2016 Developments
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Canada, European Union, India, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 29 2016

April 13, 2016: Microsoft alleged unlawful monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act in relation to InterDigital's licensing of patents


The SCC Monitor (19042016)
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • April 19 2016

The SCC recently granted leave to appeal from the judgment of the B.C. Court of Appeal in Douez v. Facebook (“Douez”), which likely garnered


Norwich orders Quebec courts unmask “anonymous” online offenders
  • Langlois Lawyers LLP
  • Canada
  • October 8 2015

In Fers et métaux américains v. Pollard, the Quebec Court of Appeal recognized that Norwich orders are indeed within the jurisdiction of Quebec


Les brevets en matière informatique : nouvelles balises
  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • Canada
  • December 12 2014

Il est fréquent que des entreprises mettent au point et tentent de protéger des éléments de propriété intellectuelle relatifs à des méthodes


U.S. Supreme Court orders Federal Circuit to reconsider online advertising patent decision
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • July 20 2012

In several recent cases involving subject matter as diverse as genes, medical diagnosis, and online advertising, the U.S. Supreme Court appears to be trying to narrow the boundaries of patent-eligible subject matter defined by the Federal Circuit


We were just one click away for Supreme Court of Canada review
  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • Canada
  • February 2 2012

We have been following with interest developments in the scope of patentable subject matter both here and in the US


An early present for Amazon Amazon’s one-click patent application allowed by the Canadian Patent Office
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • January 10 2012

In a surprising move, less than one month after the much publicized Federal Court of Appeal decision in Canada (AG) v. Amazon.com, Inc., the Commissioner of Patents has allowed Amazon’s “one-click” patent application containing the same claims that were reviewed by the Federal Court of Appeal


Amazon.com’s Canadian “one-click” patent on the threshold of issuance
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • January 6 2012

This past year was truly an important year for Canadian decisions on business method patents, both from the Court and the Commissioner of Patents, and these decisions are receiving rapid attention


CIPO allows Amazon.com 1-click patent
  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • Canada
  • January 5 2012

On December 23, 2011, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) issued a Notice of Allowance for Amazon.com’s Canadian Patent Application No. 2,246,933 (filed September 1998) the “1-Click” online purchasing process while leaving some uncertainty as to how business method patents will be handled both by CIPO and the courts going forward


Amazon.com’s one-click patent application allowed in Canada
  • Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP
  • Canada
  • January 4 2012

Following the Federal Court of Appeal decision reported in our November 2011 Blakes Bulletin, in which the Amazon.com application was remanded to the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) for further consideration, we have now heard that the application has been allowed and a patent will issue with method and apparatus claims