We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 64

PTAB continues to evolve its covered business method patent jurisprudence
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 30 2015

In two related decisions, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that patents directed to a personal computer interactive


Wireless does not mean “without wires”; “streaming video” does not mean emailing a video file
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

Reviewing a final written decision of U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), finding application claims unpatentable, the U.S. Court of


Post-Aliceclaims directed to an abstract idea must have meaningful limitations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 30 2014

Addressing patent eligibility in a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board


Is “insolubly ambiguous” the correct standard to determine compliance with Sec 112?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 5 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on a petition challenging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's standard for determining when


Post-Alice Federal Circuit finds internet advertising method to not be patent eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 18 2014

Citing the Supreme Court of the United States’ Spring 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit


On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related


PTAB threatens sanctions for unauthorized e-mails
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 8 2014

Addressing a patent owner’s unauthorized e-mail arguing for additional discovery and the petitioner’s likewise unauthorized responsive e-mail, an


Nothing non-obvious about applying pre-existing technology to the Internet
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 28 2013

Addressing the issue of obviousness of patents directed to Internet-based software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a


Appeal against exclusion from patentability of software to protect minors online allowed
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • United Kingdom
  • January 12 2012

In relation to the application by Protecting Kids the World Over (PKTWO) 2011 EWHC 2720 (Pat), the High Court of England and Wales has allowed an appeal against a decision of a Hearing Officer that found that an alarm notification system for monitoring inappropriate electronic communications fell within the computer program exclusion


Internet advertising method found to be patent-eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a method for distributing online media to consumers by having the consumer first watch a paid advertisement constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101