We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 70

Internet-centric solution is more than moving online
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 30 2015

Addressing the issue of patent-eligible subject matter in a Covered Business Method (CBM) review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board


On a plain and ordinary meaning of “embedded” code in a web page
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

Addressing a district court’s construction of the claim term “embedded” code as code “written into the HTML code of the web page” and the related


Post-Aliceclaims directed to an abstract idea must have meaningful limitations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 30 2014

Addressing patent eligibility in a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board


Google’s strategic purchase of rights and counterclaim do not survive Delaware’s statute of limitations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 30 2015

Addressing the requirements for tolling the statute of limitations (SOL), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district


Nothing non-obvious about applying pre-existing technology to the Internet
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 28 2013

Addressing the issue of obviousness of patents directed to Internet-based software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a


Federal Circuit affirms jury verdict of invalidity based on on-sale bar and public use
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 28 2012

Affirming the district court’s judgment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit cleared Facebook of allegations of patent infringement, finding that that the patent in suit was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) because the patentee’s product which embodied the patented subject matter was on sale and in public use more than one year before the filing of the patent


Appeal against exclusion from patentability of software to protect minors online allowed
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • United Kingdom
  • January 12 2012

In relation to the application by Protecting Kids the World Over (PKTWO) 2011 EWHC 2720 (Pat), the High Court of England and Wales has allowed an appeal against a decision of a Hearing Officer that found that an alarm notification system for monitoring inappropriate electronic communications fell within the computer program exclusion


Internet advertising method found to be patent-eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a method for distributing online media to consumers by having the consumer first watch a paid advertisement constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101


Amazon’s ‘one-click’ patent still alive in Canada
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • Canada
  • December 30 2011

The Canadian Federal Court of Appeal, addressing whether Amazon’s famous “one-click” business method was properly considered statutory subject matter under the Canadian Patent Act, allowed Amazon’s appeal from the Patent Appeal Board but directed the Commissioner of Patents to reexamine the patent on an expedited basis, not with the lower court’s direction that the claims at issue constituted patentable subject matter, but instead directing that the Commissioner identify the actual invention after a purposive construction of the claims