We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 136

Intel Corp. v. Negotiated Data Solution, Inc. et. Al., no. 2011-1448 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2012).
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 26 2012

A broad patent license, without language to the contrary, extends to reissue patents that are granted after the term of the license agreement. The


Dey, L.P. et al. v. Sunovion Pharm., Inc., No. 2012-1428 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2013).
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 30 2013

Clinical drug trials operating under standard confidentiality procedures do not constitute a third-party public use under pre-America Invents Act


Forrester Envtl. Servs., Inc., v. Wheelabator Techs., Inc., No. 2012-1686 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2013).
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 24 2013

State law tortious interference and trade secret misappropriation claims did not raise a "substantial question of federal patent law" authorizing


Accent Packaging, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • February 15 2013

A claim construction must not exclude the preferred embodiments, the possibility of altering an accused device to meet claim limitations does not


Arkema Inc., et. Al., v. Honeywell International, Inc.
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • February 15 2013

An alleged infringer may bring a declaratory judgment where the patentee's conduct puts it in the position of pursuing arguably illegal conduct or


Norgren, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 2011-1349 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2012)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 29 2012

A patentee appealed the International Trade Commission’s determination that an accused infringer’s importation and sale of clamp devices did not violate section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930


In re Hugh Edward Montgomery, John Francis Martin, and Jorge Daniel Erusalimsky, No. 2011-1376 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2012)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2012

Prior art describing an unexecuted process or protocol may inherently anticipate claims when the result at issue inevitably flows from its disclosures


Noah Systems, Inc. v. Intuit Inc., No. 2011-1390 (Fed. Cir. April 9, 2012)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2012

Where a special purpose computer means-plus-function claim recites multiple identifiable algorithms and the specification discloses an algorithm for less than all of them, sufficiency of the disclosure is irrelevant and courts must analyze the disclosure as if no algorithm is provided


District courts have jurisdiction over declaratory judgment actions by second ANDA filers when the first filer has not yet triggered its exclusivity period, so long as other pending litigation could remove the other barriers to the second filer’s launch
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2012

A generic pharmaceutical manufacturer filed a second ANDA with paragraph IV certifications as to all three patents listed in the Orange Book for the NDA product


Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP, et al., No. 2011-1297 (Fed. Cir. April 23, 2012)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2012

A patent’s reissued claims are not broader than the claims of a divisional counterpart simply because the divisional counterpart's claims contain limitations not present in the reissued claims