We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 584

Plaintiff Granted Dismissal Based on Covenant Not to Sue Even With Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pending
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2016

The plaintiff, Shipping and Transit, LLC ("Plaintiff"), filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Neptune Cigars, Inc. ("Defendant"), for


District Court Excludes Damage Expert's Opinion Based On Faulty Royalty Calculation
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2016

In this patent infringement action between Finjan and Sophos, the district court had previously granted a motion to exclude Finjan's damage expert


District Court Denies Request to Preclude Defendant from Sharing Confidential Information of Plaintiff with PTAB as part of Inter Partes Review
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 15 2016

In this patent infringement action between Ultratec and CaptionCall, CaptionCall filed a motion for relief from the stipulated protective order in


District Court Stays Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") over Defendant's Objection That Summary Judgment Motion Should be Determined First
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 13 2016

After the Patent Trial and Appellate Board ("PTAB") instituted inter partes review ("IPR") of all asserted claims in three of the Patents-in-Suit and


District Court Orders Production of Source Code in Searchable Format
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2016

The plaintiff, 247 Customer, Inc. ("247"), filed a lawsuit against Defendant LivePerson, Inc. ("LivePerson") alleging that LivePerson infringed


District Court Precludes Damage Expert from Using a Settlement Agreement to Derive a Reasonable Royalty Calculation Where Expert Employed a Likelihood of Liability Estimate Based Solely on a Study That Patent Holders Prevail Approximately 40 Percent
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2016

MAX Encryption Technologies ("MAZ") filed a patent infringement action against Blackberry for patent entitled "Method of Transparent Encryption and


Grecia v. McDonald's: District Court Grants Motion to Dismiss Where McDonald's Could Not "Use" System for Patent Infringement Claim Because Credit Card Companies Controlled the Entire System
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 1 2016

The plaintiff, Grecia, alleged that McDonald's infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,533,860 ("the '860 patent") and of U.S. Patent No. 8,402


Sprint v. Comcast: District Court Denies Request for Attorney's Fees Pending Appeal to the Federal Circuit
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2016

Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company brought suit against Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast IP Phone, LLC alleging


Murata v. Daifuku: District Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Motion for a Second Time After Remand from Federal Circuit Based on Pending IPR and Previously Issued Stay
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2016

In September 2013, Murata filed a patent infringement action alleging that Daifuku infringed three of its patents (the "Original Patents"). A year


EON v. Apple: District Court Permits Plaintiff to Present Technology Tutorial Through Expert Consultant Not Previously Designated
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 23 2016

Apple filed an objection to EON's plan to present a technology tutorial through its expert consultant. Apple asserted that the consultant was not